External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients

To our knowledge, this is the first published external validation of a predictive ML model within orthopedic surgery to demonstrate poor performance. This poor performance might be attributed to overfitting and sampling bias as the development cohort had an insufficient sample size, and distributional shift as our cohort had key differences in predictive variables used by the model. These findings emphasize the importance of extensive validation in different geographical areas and addressing biases and pitfalls of ML model development before clinical implementation, as untested models may do more harm than good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Spine Journal
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients

Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Darren F. Lui, Diego Agustín Abelleyra Lastoria, R. H. Kuijten et al.
6 citations
The Spine Journal
Medical Imaging and Analysis
4.04
article

External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients

Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Darren F. Lui, Diego Agustín Abelleyra Lastoria, R. H. Kuijten, Chris Taylor, Daniel G. Tobert, Olivier Q. Groot, Priyanshu Saha, Daniël C. de Reus, A Warr-Esser
article en
6 citations

Abstract

To our knowledge, this is the first published external validation of a predictive ML model within orthopedic surgery to demonstrate poor performance. This poor performance might be attributed to overfitting and sampling bias as the development cohort had an insufficient sample size, and distributional shift as our cohort had key differences in predictive variables used by the model. These findings emphasize the importance of extensive validation in different geographical areas and addressing biases and pitfalls of ML model development before clinical implementation, as untested models may do more harm than good.

The Spine JournalVol. 25(7)
Harvard University (US), Utrecht University (NL), St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
4.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients — Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Darren F. Lui, et al. · The Spine Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS