A systematic literature review of esports integrity

Abstract While esports activities have been constantly growing over the past two decades, academic literature on esports has emerged in several fields, including in the appraisal of various integrity dimensions of the games in recent years. The authors conducted a first systematic review of this literature on esports integrity in order to synthetize existing knowledge and establish the potential academic research gaps in this area. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology has been used, as well as the eSAFE conceptual framework. 57 scientific sources have been included in the analysis, which outlines a relatively laconic and fragmented literature. However, various issues related to the prevalence of integrity risks, regulatory measures and policies or perceptions from the fans and participants attract an increasing interest. Key avenues for further research are the specificities of integrity risks and management within different games, as well as sectorial-wide dimensions, such as regulation (including public law and private disciplinary frameworks) and policies design and enforcement. Finally, we discuss practical implications of our research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Sports Law Journal
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-025-00295-y
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digital Games and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic literature review of esports integrity

Erika Riedl, Pim Verschuuren
7 citations
The International Sports Law Journal
Digital Games and Media
29.41
article

A systematic literature review of esports integrity

Erika Riedl, Pim Verschuuren
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract While esports activities have been constantly growing over the past two decades, academic literature on esports has emerged in several fields, including in the appraisal of various integrity dimensions of the games in recent years. The authors conducted a first systematic review of this literature on esports integrity in order to synthetize existing knowledge and establish the potential academic research gaps in this area. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology has been used, as well as the eSAFE conceptual framework. 57 scientific sources have been included in the analysis, which outlines a relatively laconic and fragmented literature. However, various issues related to the prevalence of integrity risks, regulatory measures and policies or perceptions from the fans and participants attract an increasing interest. Key avenues for further research are the specificities of integrity risks and management within different games, as well as sectorial-wide dimensions, such as regulation (including public law and private disciplinary frameworks) and policies design and enforcement. Finally, we discuss practical implications of our research.

The International Sports Law JournalVol. 25(2)
Université Rennes 2 (FR), University of Lausanne (CH)
Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digital Games and Media
29.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.