Image Quality Analysis of Head CTs Obtained on a New Portable Scanner Compared to Stationary CT

Background/Purpose: The use of mobile head CT scanning in the ICU setting has both clinical and economic advantages, particularly if able to provide image quality close or equal to fixed CT scanners. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the image quality of a new portable CT scanner, compared to a fixed CT platform. Materials/Methods: Inpatients (n=11), age> 60 requiring head CT evaluation were enrolled and consented to obtain an additional head CT on the portable CT, following their fixed exam. Nine patients were able to complete the study; seven patients received duplicate exams with matched imaging technique, and two patients received the portable head CT at a 20% reduced dose. Spatial resolution was evaluated with an ACR phantom. Relevant Hounsfield unit measurements were compared. Subjective image quality analysis was performed utilizing nine assessment categories. Results: Spatial resolution analysis demonstrated 7 lp/cm for the Standard CT, and 8 lp/cm for the portable CT. Hounsfield unit analysis demonstrated equivalent values for Air, Fat, Grey Matter, White Matter and Bone. For subjective image quality analysis, interreader agreement was high: on a Likert scale of 1-5, all assessment categories were rated 4 to 5 (satisfied to extremely satisfied), with an average score of 4.97, even at reduced dose exams. Individual reviewer comments identified difficulties with patient positioning on the portable CT scanner. Conclusion: Findings in a small number of patients suggest that, with proper patient positioning, the imaging quality of a prototype PHCT scanner is comparable to that of a current SOCCT scanner, even at 20% reduced dose.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Lahey Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62081/2995-2115.1019
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Quality Analysis of Head CTs Obtained on a New Portable Scanner Compared to Stationary CT

Michael Anthony Smith, Mara M. Kunst, Joseph D. Burns, Juan E. Small et al.
1 links
The Lahey Journal
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Image Quality Analysis of Head CTs Obtained on a New Portable Scanner Compared to Stationary CT

Michael Anthony Smith, Mara M. Kunst, Joseph D. Burns, Juan E. Small, Christoph Wald, Sebastian Flacke
article en

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The use of mobile head CT scanning in the ICU setting has both clinical and economic advantages, particularly if able to provide image quality close or equal to fixed CT scanners. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the image quality of a new portable CT scanner, compared to a fixed CT platform. Materials/Methods: Inpatients (n=11), age> 60 requiring head CT evaluation were enrolled and consented to obtain an additional head CT on the portable CT, following their fixed exam. Nine patients were able to complete the study; seven patients received duplicate exams with matched imaging technique, and two patients received the portable head CT at a 20% reduced dose. Spatial resolution was evaluated with an ACR phantom. Relevant Hounsfield unit measurements were compared. Subjective image quality analysis was performed utilizing nine assessment categories. Results: Spatial resolution analysis demonstrated 7 lp/cm for the Standard CT, and 8 lp/cm for the portable CT. Hounsfield unit analysis demonstrated equivalent values for Air, Fat, Grey Matter, White Matter and Bone. For subjective image quality analysis, interreader agreement was high: on a Likert scale of 1-5, all assessment categories were rated 4 to 5 (satisfied to extremely satisfied), with an average score of 4.97, even at reduced dose exams. Individual reviewer comments identified difficulties with patient positioning on the portable CT scanner. Conclusion: Findings in a small number of patients suggest that, with proper patient positioning, the imaging quality of a prototype PHCT scanner is comparable to that of a current SOCCT scanner, even at 20% reduced dose.

The Lahey JournalVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Image Quality Analysis of Head CTs Obtained on a New Portable Scanner Compared to Stationary CT — Michael Anthony Smith, Mara M. Kunst, et al. · The Lahey Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS