The acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) by an Australian interior design and design education community

This research captured the early acceptance levels of artificial intelligence (AI) technology by an Australian interior design community, including educational and professional sectors. The analysed results of a survey offer a timely snapshot of attitudes toward AI, as AI tools were starting to become readily available for interior designers. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) informs analysis of the responses from the participant cohorts of students, educators, and professionals. The trialling of AI engines by the researchers for the analysis of the responses offers a new contribution of knowledge for methodology. The outcomes showed a positive general acceptance of AI, a low level of early uptake of AI tools, and concerns regarding co-creation by humans and AI. Insights expressed in the participants� responses are valuable for comparison with future research into interior design communities, as well as for AI tool developers in considering ways that AI could be useful for interior designers. The results of this research indicate the need to safeguard the joy and integrity of the human role in future design practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2025.2471297
Primary Topic
Architecture, Design, and Social History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) by an Australian interior design and design education community

Mary Lou Maher, Tony Jan, Scott Skipworth, Fiona Chatteur
International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
Architecture, Design, and Social History
article

The acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) by an Australian interior design and design education community

Mary Lou Maher, Tony Jan, Scott Skipworth, Fiona Chatteur
article en

Abstract

This research captured the early acceptance levels of artificial intelligence (AI) technology by an Australian interior design community, including educational and professional sectors. The analysed results of a survey offer a timely snapshot of attitudes toward AI, as AI tools were starting to become readily available for interior designers. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) informs analysis of the responses from the participant cohorts of students, educators, and professionals. The trialling of AI engines by the researchers for the analysis of the responses offers a new contribution of knowledge for methodology. The outcomes showed a positive general acceptance of AI, a low level of early uptake of AI tools, and concerns regarding co-creation by humans and AI. Insights expressed in the participants� responses are valuable for comparison with future research into interior design communities, as well as for AI tool developers in considering ways that AI could be useful for interior designers. The results of this research indicate the need to safeguard the joy and integrity of the human role in future design practice.

International Journal of Design Creativity and InnovationVol. 13(2)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Torrens University Australia (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Architecture, Design, and Social History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.