Evaluating the applicability of the VERHIB model to a 2600-year peat sequence from Central Germany

Plant-derived biomarkers have been used extensively for source identification of organic matter in soil, peat, and sediments. These are chemical components, primarily of leaf waxes, that are naturally more resistant to degradation than most organic molecules and can be preserved in depositional archives for hundreds to thousands of years. However, using biomarkers for vegetation reconstruction can be complicated because individual compounds or compound classes do not necessarily indicate specific plant sources. The composition across multiple compounds must be holistically evaluated to develop accurate reconstructions. The VERHIB model was developed to enable a range of n -alkane and n -alkanol data to be evaluated simultaneously and estimate past vegetation development using the biomarker signature of leaves and roots from present-day specimens of the plant species of interest compared to the preserved, mixed signature of a soil or peat core. In this study, we have applied the VERHIB model to data gathered from the Beerberg peatland in Central Germany. A previous study characterized plant macrofossils, pollen, n -alkane, n -alkanol, and n -fatty acid composition in the Beerberg peat. We have collected modern plant samples from the peatland and measured their biomarker composition to use as input for the model. Despite many overlapping biomarker signatures across plant species and parts, our results show that the model could recreate a reasonable vegetation development pattern for most of the peat core if n -fatty acid data were included alongside n -alkane data. The model had difficulty recreating the transition from poor fen vegetation to Sphagnum bog, which was evident in the plant macrofossil records, so further calibration is needed. This was the first attempt at considering n -fatty acid data in a reconstruction using the VERHIB model; previous reconstructions only included n -alkanes or a combination of n -alkanes and n -alkanols. Our study shows that n -fatty acids are a valuable compound class to add to the VERHIB model and provides recommendations for future development. • Evaluation of the VERHIB model for vegetation reconstruction. • First use of n -fatty acid data in the model, improving performance. • Highlights importance of local reference material for lipid biomarker studies. • Presents dataset of n -alkyl lipids from 16 species typical in bogs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geochemistry
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106338
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the applicability of the VERHIB model to a 2600-year peat sequence from Central Germany

E. Emiel van Loon, Guido L. B. Wiesenberg, Boris Jansen, Carrie L. Thomas
1 citations
Applied Geochemistry
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.30
article

Evaluating the applicability of the VERHIB model to a 2600-year peat sequence from Central Germany

E. Emiel van Loon, Guido L. B. Wiesenberg, Boris Jansen, Carrie L. Thomas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Plant-derived biomarkers have been used extensively for source identification of organic matter in soil, peat, and sediments. These are chemical components, primarily of leaf waxes, that are naturally more resistant to degradation than most organic molecules and can be preserved in depositional archives for hundreds to thousands of years. However, using biomarkers for vegetation reconstruction can be complicated because individual compounds or compound classes do not necessarily indicate specific plant sources. The composition across multiple compounds must be holistically evaluated to develop accurate reconstructions. The VERHIB model was developed to enable a range of n -alkane and n -alkanol data to be evaluated simultaneously and estimate past vegetation development using the biomarker signature of leaves and roots from present-day specimens of the plant species of interest compared to the preserved, mixed signature of a soil or peat core. In this study, we have applied the VERHIB model to data gathered from the Beerberg peatland in Central Germany. A previous study characterized plant macrofossils, pollen, n -alkane, n -alkanol, and n -fatty acid composition in the Beerberg peat. We have collected modern plant samples from the peatland and measured their biomarker composition to use as input for the model. Despite many overlapping biomarker signatures across plant species and parts, our results show that the model could recreate a reasonable vegetation development pattern for most of the peat core if n -fatty acid data were included alongside n -alkane data. The model had difficulty recreating the transition from poor fen vegetation to Sphagnum bog, which was evident in the plant macrofossil records, so further calibration is needed. This was the first attempt at considering n -fatty acid data in a reconstruction using the VERHIB model; previous reconstructions only included n -alkanes or a combination of n -alkanes and n -alkanols. Our study shows that n -fatty acids are a valuable compound class to add to the VERHIB model and provides recommendations for future development. • Evaluation of the VERHIB model for vegetation reconstruction. • First use of n -fatty acid data in the model, improving performance. • Highlights importance of local reference material for lipid biomarker studies. • Presents dataset of n -alkyl lipids from 16 species typical in bogs.

Applied GeochemistryVol. 184
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Zurich (CH), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.