Mazākumtautību kopienas literārās jaunrades iekļaušanās Liepājas kultūras ainavā (1960–1980)

The article aims to identify and evaluate the creative activity of minority writers and its significance in the cultural landscape of Liepāja during the Soviet period (1950s–1980s), outlining the contemporary context. The article captures and evaluates current issues related to the transfer of the literary tradition of minority Russian-language authors, opportunities for publication, relations with the Latvian-language literary community within the Liepāja and Region Young Authors Association, as well as the perspective of creative activity in the 21st century, and the aspects of social memory construction. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the article are the studies of place identity (Ross Exo Adams), microhistory, mnemohistory (Heather Murray; Jan Assmann), postmemory and ethics of memory (Marianne Hirsch; Paul Ricœur; Eelco Runia), among others. The article concludes that the literary process of the minority community writing in Russian in the period under consideration can be evaluated as an essential element of Liepāja cultural identity, a segment of the archive of experienced and inherited history. At the same time, it can be seen as a vivid testimony of postmemory, revealing the contradictory, at the same time constitutive and destabilising, character of memory. Despite the generally successful cooperation between Latvian and Russian authors, the creative process of the Russian literary community has developed as a separate phenomenon in the cultural landscape of Liepāja. The border of cultural identities based on the language, a characteristic of a bi-communal society during the Soviet period, had not been really overcome either in the Soviet period under consideration or later in independent Latvia. The reasons for this are subjective and objective, related to different understandings of the mother tongue and cultural/literary tradition, of the notions of homeland/fatherland, and of historical memory.

Publication Details

Journal
Aktuālās problēmas literatūras un kultūras pētniecībā rakstu krājums
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37384/aplkp.2025.30.291
Primary Topic
Historical and Archaeological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mazākumtautību kopienas literārās jaunrades iekļaušanās Liepājas kultūras ainavā (1960–1980)

Aktuālās problēmas literatūras un kultūras pētniecībā rakstu krājums
Historical and Archaeological Studies
article

Mazākumtautību kopienas literārās jaunrades iekļaušanās Liepājas kultūras ainavā (1960–1980)

article en

Abstract

The article aims to identify and evaluate the creative activity of minority writers and its significance in the cultural landscape of Liepāja during the Soviet period (1950s–1980s), outlining the contemporary context. The article captures and evaluates current issues related to the transfer of the literary tradition of minority Russian-language authors, opportunities for publication, relations with the Latvian-language literary community within the Liepāja and Region Young Authors Association, as well as the perspective of creative activity in the 21st century, and the aspects of social memory construction. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the article are the studies of place identity (Ross Exo Adams), microhistory, mnemohistory (Heather Murray; Jan Assmann), postmemory and ethics of memory (Marianne Hirsch; Paul Ricœur; Eelco Runia), among others. The article concludes that the literary process of the minority community writing in Russian in the period under consideration can be evaluated as an essential element of Liepāja cultural identity, a segment of the archive of experienced and inherited history. At the same time, it can be seen as a vivid testimony of postmemory, revealing the contradictory, at the same time constitutive and destabilising, character of memory. Despite the generally successful cooperation between Latvian and Russian authors, the creative process of the Russian literary community has developed as a separate phenomenon in the cultural landscape of Liepāja. The border of cultural identities based on the language, a characteristic of a bi-communal society during the Soviet period, had not been really overcome either in the Soviet period under consideration or later in independent Latvia. The reasons for this are subjective and objective, related to different understandings of the mother tongue and cultural/literary tradition, of the notions of homeland/fatherland, and of historical memory.

Aktuālās problēmas literatūras un kultūras pētniecībā rakstu krājums(30)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Historical and Archaeological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.