Differences in estimates of extinction risk between occupancy and abundance data

Temporal trends in populations are often measured with presence-absence and abundance data. These data types are inherently different, but quantitative comparisons of threat statuses assessed through occupancy or abundance data are currently lacking. We applied International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria to estimate extinction risk of amphibians on the basis of data collected over 25 years. We examined whether occupancy and abundance models provided consistent threat status. Occupancy and abundance data suggested declines for the study species in the study area, but occupancy generally showed smaller proportional changes compared with abundance data. Abundance data yielded higher threat categories than occupancy data but were generally associated with larger uncertainties. With abundance data, population declines were found sooner than with occupancy data, but occupancy data estimates were more robust; thus, we advocate the integration of multiple measures of decline when assessing threat status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70020
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in estimates of extinction risk between occupancy and abundance data

Mattia Falaschi, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Elia Lo Parrino, Raoul Manenti
5 citations
Conservation Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
article

Differences in estimates of extinction risk between occupancy and abundance data

Mattia Falaschi, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Elia Lo Parrino, Raoul Manenti
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Temporal trends in populations are often measured with presence-absence and abundance data. These data types are inherently different, but quantitative comparisons of threat statuses assessed through occupancy or abundance data are currently lacking. We applied International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria to estimate extinction risk of amphibians on the basis of data collected over 25 years. We examined whether occupancy and abundance models provided consistent threat status. Occupancy and abundance data suggested declines for the study species in the study area, but occupancy generally showed smaller proportional changes compared with abundance data. Abundance data yielded higher threat categories than occupancy data but were generally associated with larger uncertainties. With abundance data, population declines were found sooner than with occupancy data, but occupancy data estimates were more robust; thus, we advocate the integration of multiple measures of decline when assessing threat status.

Conservation BiologyVol. 39(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Milan (IT), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differences in estimates of extinction risk between occupancy and abundance data — Mattia Falaschi, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, et al. · Conservation Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS