Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits

Osteological sex estimation utilizing morphological traits of the skull primarily focuses on a set of five traits. Developing new models with an expanded suite of traits has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies and improve the classification of partial and fragmentary remains. Thus, this study seeks to improve classification accuracies for osteological sex estimation from the skull by assessing an expanded suite of traits and generating multiple decision tree classification models. Twenty-one traits were evaluated for a sample of 403 adult males and females. Krippendorff's alpha was used to assess intraobserver error, and aligned rank transformation was used to examine the effects of sex, age, population, and secular change on the traits. Prior to generating the decision trees, the data were randomly split into 80% model training samples and 20% holdout validation testing samples to test the predictive accuracy of each tree. The trees were generated for traits from the skull, cranium, and mandible. Separate trees were also generated for African Americans and European Americans, as well as for the pooled population sample. Overall, the recommended decision trees for the skull and cranium achieved higher accuracies (91.0%-100%) than models generated for the mandible (75.8%-85.0%). Additionally, the recommended pooled population (81.3%-97.3%) decision trees achieved similar accuracies compared with the African American (75.8%-94.0%) and European American (85.0%-100%) trees. Further, the trees generated in this study achieved improved classification accuracies for the skull compared with the current five-trait method by incorporating an expanded suite of traits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits

John J. Schultz, Donovan M. Adams, Morgan Ferrell
1 citations
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
8.27
article

Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits

John J. Schultz, Donovan M. Adams, Morgan Ferrell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Osteological sex estimation utilizing morphological traits of the skull primarily focuses on a set of five traits. Developing new models with an expanded suite of traits has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies and improve the classification of partial and fragmentary remains. Thus, this study seeks to improve classification accuracies for osteological sex estimation from the skull by assessing an expanded suite of traits and generating multiple decision tree classification models. Twenty-one traits were evaluated for a sample of 403 adult males and females. Krippendorff's alpha was used to assess intraobserver error, and aligned rank transformation was used to examine the effects of sex, age, population, and secular change on the traits. Prior to generating the decision trees, the data were randomly split into 80% model training samples and 20% holdout validation testing samples to test the predictive accuracy of each tree. The trees were generated for traits from the skull, cranium, and mandible. Separate trees were also generated for African Americans and European Americans, as well as for the pooled population sample. Overall, the recommended decision trees for the skull and cranium achieved higher accuracies (91.0%-100%) than models generated for the mandible (75.8%-85.0%). Additionally, the recommended pooled population (81.3%-97.3%) decision trees achieved similar accuracies compared with the African American (75.8%-94.0%) and European American (85.0%-100%) trees. Further, the trees generated in this study achieved improved classification accuracies for the skull compared with the current five-trait method by incorporating an expanded suite of traits.

Journal of Forensic SciencesVol. 70(3)
University of Central Florida (US), University of Kentucky (US), National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.