Reducing Health Inequity for Children and Young People in Rural Australia: Are Digital Interventions a Panacea? A Rural Generalist's Commentary

Digital interventions such as telephone and video consultations, online tools, child-friendly robot ward rounds, and digital GP-paediatrician co-consulting models show great promise in helping to bridge the gap in health outcomes for rural Australian CYP. Models of care that utilise digital components can provide care closer to home for rural families; however, research to evaluate the effectiveness of these models in the Australian context is lacking. Infrastructure challenges, cultural considerations, and patient preferences limit the utility of digital interventions for some populations. A panacea? Unfortunately, not; however, these technologies herald an exciting new phase in healthcare for rural Australian CYP, and digital interventions are likely to play an increasingly important role in increasing access to care for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.70015
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Health Inequity for Children and Young People in Rural Australia: Are Digital Interventions a Panacea? A Rural Generalist's Commentary

Raghu Lingam, Lena Amanda Sanci, Nan Hu, Tammy Morris et al.
4 citations
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Global Health Workforce Issues
7.55
article

Reducing Health Inequity for Children and Young People in Rural Australia: Are Digital Interventions a Panacea? A Rural Generalist's Commentary

Raghu Lingam, Lena Amanda Sanci, Nan Hu, Tammy Morris, David Schmidt, Amy B. Christie, Hayley Smithers‐Sheedy, C. D. Miller
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Digital interventions such as telephone and video consultations, online tools, child-friendly robot ward rounds, and digital GP-paediatrician co-consulting models show great promise in helping to bridge the gap in health outcomes for rural Australian CYP. Models of care that utilise digital components can provide care closer to home for rural families; however, research to evaluate the effectiveness of these models in the Australian context is lacking. Infrastructure challenges, cultural considerations, and patient preferences limit the utility of digital interventions for some populations. A panacea? Unfortunately, not; however, these technologies herald an exciting new phase in healthcare for rural Australian CYP, and digital interventions are likely to play an increasingly important role in increasing access to care for this population.

Australian Journal of Rural HealthVol. 33(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Health Workforce Issues
7.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reducing Health Inequity for Children and Young People in Rural Australia: Are Digital Interventions a Panacea? A Rural Generalist's Commentary — Raghu Lingam, Lena Amanda Sanci, et al. · Australian Journal of Rural Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS