The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study

We estimated the effects of sleep duration, trouble sleeping, and job time (day, evening, shift, and night work) on fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception. We analysed data from a preconception cohort study of 10 475 Danish females aged 18-45 years attempting to conceive. On baseline questionnaires, females reported on sleep duration (hours/day), trouble sleeping (never, sometimes, approx. 50% of the time, most of the time), and job time. Pregnancy status was ascertained from follow-up questionnaires completed every 8 weeks for up to 12 months. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs), adjusted for potential confounders. Compared with 8 h/day of sleep, FRs were 0.94 for ≤6 h/day (95% CI, 0.83-1.08), 0.97 for 7 h/day (95% CI, 0.89-1.06), and 0.96 for ≥9 h/day (95% CI, 0.81-1.13). Compared with no trouble sleeping, FRs were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) for trouble sleeping sometimes, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03) for trouble sleeping approx. 50% of the time, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10) for trouble sleeping most of the time. Relative to day work, FRs were 1.12 for shift work (95% CI, 1.04-1.20), 0.77 for night work (95% CI, 0.49-1.22) and 1.10 for evening work (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). Self-reported sleep duration and trouble sleeping were not appreciably associated with fecundability. Shift work was associated with a slightly higher fecundability, while night work was associated with slightly lower fecundability, although associations were imprecise. Potential limitations include misclassification of sleep and residual or unmeasured confounding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf039
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study

Ellen M. Mikkelsen, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Elizabeth Elliott Hatch, Lauren Anne Wise et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

The association between sleep and fecundability: a Danish preconception cohort study

Ellen M. Mikkelsen, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Elizabeth Elliott Hatch, Lauren Anne Wise, Mariann Christensen
article en

Abstract

We estimated the effects of sleep duration, trouble sleeping, and job time (day, evening, shift, and night work) on fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception. We analysed data from a preconception cohort study of 10 475 Danish females aged 18-45 years attempting to conceive. On baseline questionnaires, females reported on sleep duration (hours/day), trouble sleeping (never, sometimes, approx. 50% of the time, most of the time), and job time. Pregnancy status was ascertained from follow-up questionnaires completed every 8 weeks for up to 12 months. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs), adjusted for potential confounders. Compared with 8 h/day of sleep, FRs were 0.94 for ≤6 h/day (95% CI, 0.83-1.08), 0.97 for 7 h/day (95% CI, 0.89-1.06), and 0.96 for ≥9 h/day (95% CI, 0.81-1.13). Compared with no trouble sleeping, FRs were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) for trouble sleeping sometimes, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03) for trouble sleeping approx. 50% of the time, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10) for trouble sleeping most of the time. Relative to day work, FRs were 1.12 for shift work (95% CI, 1.04-1.20), 0.77 for night work (95% CI, 0.49-1.22) and 1.10 for evening work (95% CI, 0.91-1.33). Self-reported sleep duration and trouble sleeping were not appreciably associated with fecundability. Shift work was associated with a slightly higher fecundability, while night work was associated with slightly lower fecundability, although associations were imprecise. Potential limitations include misclassification of sleep and residual or unmeasured confounding.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(3)
Boston University (US), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd, TrygFonden, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.