Risk Stratification for Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancers—Implication for Treatment Intensification
The standard 2 mm cutoff for the extent of ENE failed to reveal sufficient hazard discrimination for OS/DFS. Instead, the 4 mm cutoff determined on ROC analysis was found to have the best predictive ability for DFS.
Authors
- Smriti Panda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-8611)
- Chirom Amit Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-8093)
- Karthika Chettuvatti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0655-277X)
- Anup Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-7106)
- Sandipta Mitra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-9200)
- Kapil Sikka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-4518)
- Kavneet Kaur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-3002)
- Rajeev Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-0428)
- Aanchal Kakkar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-1099)
- Rachit Sood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-1296)
- Areej Moideen
- Akash Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9442-3597)
- Alok Thakar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-8932)
- Nongthombam Surjalata Devi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-5803)
- Amit Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2328-5968)
- Aman Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-0499)
- Vishwajeet Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2696-8357)
Institutions
- Cancer Institute (WIA) (IN)
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Head & Neck
- Published
- 2025-03-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28144
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.39