Correlation of the VFSS Esophageal Screen to High‐Resolution Esophageal Manometry

ABSTRACT Objective The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high‐resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Materials and Methods This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen. Results An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 ( p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105). Conclusions The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32157
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of the VFSS Esophageal Screen to High‐Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Shreya Chablaney, Joseph J. Lebowitz, Anzalee Khan, Paul E. Kwak et al.
2 citations
The Laryngoscope
Esophageal and GI Pathology
4.01
article

Correlation of the VFSS Esophageal Screen to High‐Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Shreya Chablaney, Joseph J. Lebowitz, Anzalee Khan, Paul E. Kwak, Rita M. Knotts, Matina Balou, Milan R. Amin, Tyler Crosby, Uche C. Ezeh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high‐resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Materials and Methods This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen. Results An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 ( p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105). Conclusions The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders. Level of Evidence 3.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(7)
University of California, San Francisco (US), New York University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.