Experience: Bridging Data Measurement and Ethical Challenges with Extended Data Briefs

To promote the responsible development and use of data-driven technologies—such as machine learning and artificial intelligence—principles of trustworthiness, accountability, and fairness should be followed. The quality of the dataset on which these applications rely is crucial to achieve compliance with the required ethical principles. Quantitative approaches to measure data quality are abundant in the literature and among practitioners; however, they are not sufficient to cover all the principles and ethical challenges involved. In this article, we show that complementing data quality with measurable dimensions of data documentation and of data balance helps to cover a wider range of ethical challenges connected to the use of datasets in algorithms. A synthetic report of the metrics applied (the Extended Data Brief) and a set of Risk Labels for the Ethical Challenges provide a practical overview of the potential ethical harms due to data composition. We believe that the proposed data labeling scheme will enable practitioners to improve the overall quality of datasets and to build more responsible data-driven software systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3726872
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience: Bridging Data Measurement and Ethical Challenges with Extended Data Briefs

Marco Torchiano, Gian Antonio Susto, Juan Carlos De Martin, Antonio Vetrò et al.
1 citations
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Experience: Bridging Data Measurement and Ethical Challenges with Extended Data Briefs

Marco Torchiano, Gian Antonio Susto, Juan Carlos De Martin, Antonio Vetrò, Alessandro Fabris, Gianmaria Silvello, Marco Rondina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To promote the responsible development and use of data-driven technologies—such as machine learning and artificial intelligence—principles of trustworthiness, accountability, and fairness should be followed. The quality of the dataset on which these applications rely is crucial to achieve compliance with the required ethical principles. Quantitative approaches to measure data quality are abundant in the literature and among practitioners; however, they are not sufficient to cover all the principles and ethical challenges involved. In this article, we show that complementing data quality with measurable dimensions of data documentation and of data balance helps to cover a wider range of ethical challenges connected to the use of datasets in algorithms. A synthetic report of the metrics applied (the Extended Data Brief) and a set of Risk Labels for the Ethical Challenges provide a practical overview of the potential ethical harms due to data composition. We believe that the proposed data labeling scheme will enable practitioners to improve the overall quality of datasets and to build more responsible data-driven software systems.

Journal of Data and Information QualityVol. 17(2)
University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.