Spatial Bar: Exploring Window Switching Techniques for Large Virtual Displays

Virtual displays provided through head-worn displays (HWDs) offer users large screen space for productivity, but managing this space effectively presents challenges. Existing research shows that while increased screen space improves performance, it can also introduce significant window management overhead. This paper explores how to enhance window-switching strategies for virtual displays by leveraging eye tracking provided by HWDs and underutilized spaces around the main display area. We investigate the efficiency and usability of different cursor behaviors and selection modes in a Spatial Bar interface for window-switching tasks in augmented reality environments. Our study involved two primary selection modes: Gaze and Cursor, each tested with two cursor behaviors: Teleport and Stay. We measured objective performance metrics, including task completion time and error rates, and subjective evaluations using the NASA TLX and custom questionnaires. Results show that Cursor Stay, while familiar and comfortable for participants, was laborious and led to longer task completion times, particularly over large distances. Gaze Teleport led to the quickest window switching times, particularly in tasks where the original cursor position or the target window were far from the Spatial Bar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vr59515.2025.00043
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Interactive and Immersive Displays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Bar: Exploring Window Switching Techniques for Large Virtual Displays

Leonardo Pavanatto, Doug A. Bowman, Jens Grubert
3 citations
Interactive and Immersive Displays
5.81
article

Spatial Bar: Exploring Window Switching Techniques for Large Virtual Displays

Leonardo Pavanatto, Doug A. Bowman, Jens Grubert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Virtual displays provided through head-worn displays (HWDs) offer users large screen space for productivity, but managing this space effectively presents challenges. Existing research shows that while increased screen space improves performance, it can also introduce significant window management overhead. This paper explores how to enhance window-switching strategies for virtual displays by leveraging eye tracking provided by HWDs and underutilized spaces around the main display area. We investigate the efficiency and usability of different cursor behaviors and selection modes in a Spatial Bar interface for window-switching tasks in augmented reality environments. Our study involved two primary selection modes: Gaze and Cursor, each tested with two cursor behaviors: Teleport and Stay. We measured objective performance metrics, including task completion time and error rates, and subjective evaluations using the NASA TLX and custom questionnaires. Results show that Cursor Stay, while familiar and comfortable for participants, was laborious and led to longer task completion times, particularly over large distances. Gaze Teleport led to the quickest window switching times, particularly in tasks where the original cursor position or the target window were far from the Spatial Bar.

Coburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), Human Media (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Interactive and Immersive Displays
5.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spatial Bar: Exploring Window Switching Techniques for Large Virtual Displays — Leonardo Pavanatto, Doug A. Bowman, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS