Suppliers’ AI adoption and customers’ carbon emissions: firm-level evidence from China

Using panel data of Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2021, we investigate whether and how suppliers’ artificial intelligence (AI) adoption affects their customers’ carbon emissions. We find that increased AI adoption by supplier firms reduces their customers’ carbon emissions, and this result is robust to various tests. The main mechanisms are the innovation chain (measured by green innovation patents) and the capital chain (based on trade credit). Cross-sectional analyses reveal that the negative impact is more pronounced for customers boasting higher ESG score, better absorptive capacity, lower resource endowments, or stronger coordination with the suppliers. We also show that as firms adopt more AI, their own carbon emissions rise, but the carbon emissions of their downstream customers across multiple tiers fall. Our findings suggest that a firm’s position in the supply chain determines whether AI positively or negatively impacts its carbon emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2482246
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suppliers’ AI adoption and customers’ carbon emissions: firm-level evidence from China

Feng Li Han, Qin Qi, Shengjie Zhou
6 citations
Applied Economics
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.79
article

Suppliers’ AI adoption and customers’ carbon emissions: firm-level evidence from China

Feng Li Han, Qin Qi, Shengjie Zhou
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Using panel data of Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2021, we investigate whether and how suppliers’ artificial intelligence (AI) adoption affects their customers’ carbon emissions. We find that increased AI adoption by supplier firms reduces their customers’ carbon emissions, and this result is robust to various tests. The main mechanisms are the innovation chain (measured by green innovation patents) and the capital chain (based on trade credit). Cross-sectional analyses reveal that the negative impact is more pronounced for customers boasting higher ESG score, better absorptive capacity, lower resource endowments, or stronger coordination with the suppliers. We also show that as firms adopt more AI, their own carbon emissions rise, but the carbon emissions of their downstream customers across multiple tiers fall. Our findings suggest that a firm’s position in the supply chain determines whether AI positively or negatively impacts its carbon emissions.

Applied EconomicsVol. 57(24)
University of International Business and Economics (CN), Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Suppliers’ AI adoption and customers’ carbon emissions: firm-level evidence from China — Feng Li Han, Qin Qi, et al. · Applied Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS