Stress analysis of different experimental finite element models of rotary endodontic instruments

Abstract Aim The mechanical response was assessed through finite element analysis by comparing the cross-sectional impact of two rotary file mathematical models: CM wire and R-Phase. Methods New rotary file model designs were developed using computer-aided design software, specifically the SolidWorks package, along with finite element models. The files featured a triangular cross section at the tip, transitioning to either a rhomboid or rectangular cross section with eccentricity. Each model was subjected to cantilever bending and torsional stress analysis. Results The analysis revealed that the maximum stress values were highest for the rectangular cross section (R-phase), followed by the rectangular cross section (CM wire), then the rhomboid cross section (R-phase), with the lowest values associated with the rhomboid cross section (CM wire). In terms of maximum torsional stress, the rectangular cross section (R-phase) again exhibited the highest values, followed by the rectangular cross section (CM), rhomboid cross section (R-phase), and lastly, the rhomboid cross section (CM). These results support clinical recommendations to use files with a triangular-shaped tip and eccentric cross sections to minimize the risk of ledging, thereby enhancing clinical performance by reducing screw-in forces. Additionally, the rectangular cross-section file model demonstrated greater displacement compared to the rhomboid cross-section model. Nevertheless, the rhomboid cross section exhibited superior torsional resistance relative to the rectangular model. Conclusion It was highlighted that both bending and torsional resistance are critical factors to consider when designing file models. Detailed reporting and clear illustration of test results under these loading conditions are crucial for guiding future design improvements and ensuring optimal performance in clinical settings. This attention to detail will help in developing file models that enhance mechanical properties while minimizing risks during use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-025-01313-7
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress analysis of different experimental finite element models of rotary endodontic instruments

Amira Galal Ismail, Nada Omar, Manar Galal
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Stress analysis of different experimental finite element models of rotary endodontic instruments

Amira Galal Ismail, Nada Omar, Manar Galal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim The mechanical response was assessed through finite element analysis by comparing the cross-sectional impact of two rotary file mathematical models: CM wire and R-Phase. Methods New rotary file model designs were developed using computer-aided design software, specifically the SolidWorks package, along with finite element models. The files featured a triangular cross section at the tip, transitioning to either a rhomboid or rectangular cross section with eccentricity. Each model was subjected to cantilever bending and torsional stress analysis. Results The analysis revealed that the maximum stress values were highest for the rectangular cross section (R-phase), followed by the rectangular cross section (CM wire), then the rhomboid cross section (R-phase), with the lowest values associated with the rhomboid cross section (CM wire). In terms of maximum torsional stress, the rectangular cross section (R-phase) again exhibited the highest values, followed by the rectangular cross section (CM), rhomboid cross section (R-phase), and lastly, the rhomboid cross section (CM). These results support clinical recommendations to use files with a triangular-shaped tip and eccentric cross sections to minimize the risk of ledging, thereby enhancing clinical performance by reducing screw-in forces. Additionally, the rectangular cross-section file model demonstrated greater displacement compared to the rhomboid cross-section model. Nevertheless, the rhomboid cross section exhibited superior torsional resistance relative to the rectangular model. Conclusion It was highlighted that both bending and torsional resistance are critical factors to consider when designing file models. Detailed reporting and clear illustration of test results under these loading conditions are crucial for guiding future design improvements and ensuring optimal performance in clinical settings. This attention to detail will help in developing file models that enhance mechanical properties while minimizing risks during use.

Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research CenterVol. 49(1)
National Research Centre (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.