A single-base mutation in promoter of <i>CsTPR</i> enhances the negative regulation on mechanical-related leaf drooping in tea plants

Mechanical harvesting in the tea industry has become increasingly essential due to its advantages in increasing productivity and reducing labor costs. Leaf droopiness caused a high rate of broken leaves, hindering the mechanized harvesting quality. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We herein identified a quantitative trait locus, designated as <i>q10.3</i>, along with three lead single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located near a <i>TPR</i> gene (<i>TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT</i>), named <i>CsTPR</i>, through performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 130 tea accessions. Integrated analysis of RNA-seq and ATAC-seq confirmed <i>CsTPR</i> as a droopiness-associated candidate gene at the transcriptional level. <i>CsTPR</i> was then proved to negatively regulate brassinosteroid-induced droopiness by using the <i>CsTPR</i>-silencing tea plant. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) combined with genome walking further indicated that a single-base mutation (T-A) in the promoter of <i>CsTPR</i>. ChIP-seq revealed that this mutation occurred within the binding site, E-box, of CsBES1.2 on the <i>CsTPR</i> promoter. Notably, CsBES1.2 bound the E-box of <i>CsTPR</i> promoter to repress the expression of <i>CsTPR</i>, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ChIP-qPCR), electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), and transient assays. The single-base mutation strengthened the inhibitory effect of CsBES1.2 on the expression of <i>CsTPR</i> via enhancing the binding affinity to the E-box. Altogether, our findings suggest that CsTPR negatively regulates droopiness in tea plants under the transcriptional repression of CsBES1.2 and that a single-base mutation within E-box amplifies the suppression of CsBES1.2 on the expression of <i>CsTPR</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Horticulture Research
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhaf098
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant responses to water stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A single-base mutation in promoter of CsTPR enhances the negative regulation on mechanical-related leaf drooping in tea plants

Ming-Zhe Yao, Jian‐Qiang Ma, Liang Chen, Jiedan Chen et al.
3 citations
Horticulture Research
Plant responses to water stress
5.25
article

A single-base mutation in promoter of CsTPR enhances the negative regulation on mechanical-related leaf drooping in tea plants

Ming-Zhe Yao, Jian‐Qiang Ma, Liang Chen, Jiedan Chen, C.Y. Tang, Ji-Qiang Jin, Weizhong He, Lingxiao Duan, Haoran Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mechanical harvesting in the tea industry has become increasingly essential due to its advantages in increasing productivity and reducing labor costs. Leaf droopiness caused a high rate of broken leaves, hindering the mechanized harvesting quality. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We herein identified a quantitative trait locus, designated as <i>q10.3</i>, along with three lead single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located near a <i>TPR</i> gene (<i>TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT</i>), named <i>CsTPR</i>, through performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 130 tea accessions. Integrated analysis of RNA-seq and ATAC-seq confirmed <i>CsTPR</i> as a droopiness-associated candidate gene at the transcriptional level. <i>CsTPR</i> was then proved to negatively regulate brassinosteroid-induced droopiness by using the <i>CsTPR</i>-silencing tea plant. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) combined with genome walking further indicated that a single-base mutation (T-A) in the promoter of <i>CsTPR</i>. ChIP-seq revealed that this mutation occurred within the binding site, E-box, of CsBES1.2 on the <i>CsTPR</i> promoter. Notably, CsBES1.2 bound the E-box of <i>CsTPR</i> promoter to repress the expression of <i>CsTPR</i>, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ChIP-qPCR), electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), and transient assays. The single-base mutation strengthened the inhibitory effect of CsBES1.2 on the expression of <i>CsTPR</i> via enhancing the binding affinity to the E-box. Altogether, our findings suggest that CsTPR negatively regulates droopiness in tea plants under the transcriptional repression of CsBES1.2 and that a single-base mutation within E-box amplifies the suppression of CsBES1.2 on the expression of <i>CsTPR</i>.

Horticulture ResearchVol. 12(7)
Yunnan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Tea Research Institute (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Lishui Academy of Forestry (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant responses to water stress
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.