Identifying and Prioritizing Key Challenges in Launching Startups in the Health Sector in Iran

Background: The health sector (HS) has emerged as a pivotal arena for startups, propelled by technological innovation and the increasing demand for transformative healthcare solutions. Despite this, startups in this sector face unique challenges that hinder their growth and sustainability. A systematic understanding of these barriers is crucial to fostering a supportive ecosystem and enhancing their contribution to healthcare advancement. Objectives: The present study aims to identify and rank the principal challenges encountered by founders when launching HS startups, providing actionable recommendations for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and stakeholders. Methods: A sequential-exploratory mixed-methods design was employed. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 14 founders of successful health startups in Kermanshah province, selected via purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was conducted following Graneheim and Lundman’s (2004) framework. Quantitative validation involved a researcher-developed questionnaire administered to the same cohort, with data analyzed using the Friedman test to prioritize challenges by significance. Results: The analysis identified 68 critical challenges, prioritized using the Friedman test, and categorized into 15 key factors: (1) Regulatory and licensing hurdles, (2) economic and financial constraints, (3) gaps in knowledge and technology infrastructure, (4) organizational and team dynamics, (5) market and marketing strategy deficiencies, (6) underdeveloped entrepreneurial ecosystems, (7) technological and communication barriers, (8) social and ethical concerns, (9) healthcare system complexities, (10) inadequate training and empowerment, (11) technical limitations, (12) international market entry challenges, (13) inefficiencies in research and innovation systems, (14) knowledge transfer obstacles, and (15) cultural barriers. Conclusions: This study presents a prioritized framework to assist founders in proactively navigating challenges, devising risk mitigation strategies, and leveraging opportunities. For policymakers, the findings highlight the urgency of regulatory reforms, simplified licensing, and ecosystem development to foster innovation. Addressing these barriers can enhance the viability of health startups, driving sustainable advancements in healthcare delivery. The outcomes serve as a strategic guide for stakeholders to align efforts, optimize resource allocation, and strengthen the HS startup ecosystem, ultimately improving healthcare outcomes through scalable, technology-driven solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Reports and Technology
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/jhrt-150048
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying and Prioritizing Key Challenges in Launching Startups in the Health Sector in Iran

Nader Naderi, Bijan Rezaei, Sepideh Amiri
Journal of Health Reports and Technology
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Identifying and Prioritizing Key Challenges in Launching Startups in the Health Sector in Iran

Nader Naderi, Bijan Rezaei, Sepideh Amiri
article en

Abstract

Background: The health sector (HS) has emerged as a pivotal arena for startups, propelled by technological innovation and the increasing demand for transformative healthcare solutions. Despite this, startups in this sector face unique challenges that hinder their growth and sustainability. A systematic understanding of these barriers is crucial to fostering a supportive ecosystem and enhancing their contribution to healthcare advancement. Objectives: The present study aims to identify and rank the principal challenges encountered by founders when launching HS startups, providing actionable recommendations for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and stakeholders. Methods: A sequential-exploratory mixed-methods design was employed. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 14 founders of successful health startups in Kermanshah province, selected via purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was conducted following Graneheim and Lundman’s (2004) framework. Quantitative validation involved a researcher-developed questionnaire administered to the same cohort, with data analyzed using the Friedman test to prioritize challenges by significance. Results: The analysis identified 68 critical challenges, prioritized using the Friedman test, and categorized into 15 key factors: (1) Regulatory and licensing hurdles, (2) economic and financial constraints, (3) gaps in knowledge and technology infrastructure, (4) organizational and team dynamics, (5) market and marketing strategy deficiencies, (6) underdeveloped entrepreneurial ecosystems, (7) technological and communication barriers, (8) social and ethical concerns, (9) healthcare system complexities, (10) inadequate training and empowerment, (11) technical limitations, (12) international market entry challenges, (13) inefficiencies in research and innovation systems, (14) knowledge transfer obstacles, and (15) cultural barriers. Conclusions: This study presents a prioritized framework to assist founders in proactively navigating challenges, devising risk mitigation strategies, and leveraging opportunities. For policymakers, the findings highlight the urgency of regulatory reforms, simplified licensing, and ecosystem development to foster innovation. Addressing these barriers can enhance the viability of health startups, driving sustainable advancements in healthcare delivery. The outcomes serve as a strategic guide for stakeholders to align efforts, optimize resource allocation, and strengthen the HS startup ecosystem, ultimately improving healthcare outcomes through scalable, technology-driven solutions.

Journal of Health Reports and TechnologyVol. 11(2)
Razi University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.