Environmental and economic dimensions of material recycling and energy efficiency in the European Union

The current use rate of recycled material in the European Union (EU), at 11.5 percent in 2022, arguably undermines the bloc's 2030 target of reaching twice the recycled material use rate between 2020 and 2030. Given the current scenario, this investigation attempts to corroborate whether material circularity improve environmental quality without compromising economic performance. Due to its ability to provide robust inferences, a two-step dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed for the dataset spanning 2010 to 2022. Other indicators were also incorporated into the analysis through two distinct models. Foremost, the finding shows that material circularity and primary energy consumption mitigate per capita carbon emission while income level and energy efficiency show detrimental effect on environmental quality. For economic dimension, both material circularity and energy efficiency hamper income level but income level improves with increase in total primary energy consumption and urbanization. Importantly, although the use rate of recycled material improves environmental quality and hampers income level, the elasticities are small in magnitude. However, this observation provides important insight on the need to drive the economic dividend of material circularity as much as its environmental benefits. • Material circularity negatively impacts per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Primary energy use respectively mitigates and spurs per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Energy efficiency respectively spurs and mitigates per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Per capita GDP spurs per capita carbon emission, thus worsening environmental quality. • Urban population spurs per capita GDP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145381
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and economic dimensions of material recycling and energy efficiency in the European Union

Andrew Adewale Alola, Gizem Uzuner, Sinan Erdoğan
4 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
3.99
article

Environmental and economic dimensions of material recycling and energy efficiency in the European Union

Andrew Adewale Alola, Gizem Uzuner, Sinan Erdoğan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The current use rate of recycled material in the European Union (EU), at 11.5 percent in 2022, arguably undermines the bloc's 2030 target of reaching twice the recycled material use rate between 2020 and 2030. Given the current scenario, this investigation attempts to corroborate whether material circularity improve environmental quality without compromising economic performance. Due to its ability to provide robust inferences, a two-step dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) was employed for the dataset spanning 2010 to 2022. Other indicators were also incorporated into the analysis through two distinct models. Foremost, the finding shows that material circularity and primary energy consumption mitigate per capita carbon emission while income level and energy efficiency show detrimental effect on environmental quality. For economic dimension, both material circularity and energy efficiency hamper income level but income level improves with increase in total primary energy consumption and urbanization. Importantly, although the use rate of recycled material improves environmental quality and hampers income level, the elasticities are small in magnitude. However, this observation provides important insight on the need to drive the economic dividend of material circularity as much as its environmental benefits. • Material circularity negatively impacts per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Primary energy use respectively mitigates and spurs per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Energy efficiency respectively spurs and mitigates per capitas of carbon emission and GDP. • Per capita GDP spurs per capita carbon emission, thus worsening environmental quality. • Urban population spurs per capita GDP.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 503
Applied Science Private University (JO), İstanbul Nişantaşı Üniversitesi (TR), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR), University of Inland Norway (NO), Mustafa Kemal University (TR), National University of Uzbekistan (UZ), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
3.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.