Comparison of the accuracy of the image registration methods for the impressions of edentulous jaws

The manual multi-point combined global registration method is more accurate than the best fit alignment used in the registration of edentulous jaw impressions and is more effective for the maxilla.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06187-7
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the accuracy of the image registration methods for the impressions of edentulous jaws

Xiaotong Li, Mingli Liu, Zhe Qu
1 links
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Comparison of the accuracy of the image registration methods for the impressions of edentulous jaws

Xiaotong Li, Mingli Liu, Zhe Qu
article en

Abstract

The manual multi-point combined global registration method is more accurate than the best fit alignment used in the registration of edentulous jaw impressions and is more effective for the maxilla.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 29(4)
Jinan Stomatological Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the accuracy of the image registration methods for the impressions of edentulous jaws — Xiaotong Li, Mingli Liu, et al. · Clinical Oral Investigations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS