How to involve society into the ethics of non-invasive brain stimulation? Strategies for broader participation of stakeholders

Research and use of emerging neurotechnologies raise challenging ethical questions. We argue that a broad societal inclusion of different groups is needed in neuroethical deliberations which poses methodological challenges. Three requirements for participatory processes in the field of neuroethics include: (i) Integration of different types of knowledge, (ii) Debate about potential futures of neurotechnologies, and (iii) Balancing of technical-medical and societal-social concerns. One approach to meet these requirements is a “design-based and co-creative” participatory process. The approach ensures that all project interactions are easily accessible and relevant to all stakeholders and go beyond a survey of stakeholder opinions. Development and explication of ethical issues is consequently no longer a matter of small groups of specialists but systematically organized among the engagements of different stakeholder groups. • Involving social stakeholders in neurotechnological issues presents researchers with specific challenges. • It is important to integrate knowledge types, debate futures, and balance technical-medical with societal perspectives. • Methodologically, this can be achieved particularly well through design-based and participatory processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102890
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to involve society into the ethics of non-invasive brain stimulation? Strategies for broader participation of stakeholders

Adrian Carter, Andrea Antal, Moritz Julian Maier, Perianen Ramasawmy et al.
1 citations
Technology in Society
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
article

How to involve society into the ethics of non-invasive brain stimulation? Strategies for broader participation of stakeholders

Adrian Carter, Andrea Antal, Moritz Julian Maier, Perianen Ramasawmy, Judith Breuer, Georg Northoff, Antonio Oliviero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research and use of emerging neurotechnologies raise challenging ethical questions. We argue that a broad societal inclusion of different groups is needed in neuroethical deliberations which poses methodological challenges. Three requirements for participatory processes in the field of neuroethics include: (i) Integration of different types of knowledge, (ii) Debate about potential futures of neurotechnologies, and (iii) Balancing of technical-medical and societal-social concerns. One approach to meet these requirements is a “design-based and co-creative” participatory process. The approach ensures that all project interactions are easily accessible and relevant to all stakeholders and go beyond a survey of stakeholder opinions. Development and explication of ethical issues is consequently no longer a matter of small groups of specialists but systematically organized among the engagements of different stakeholder groups. • Involving social stakeholders in neurotechnological issues presents researchers with specific challenges. • It is important to integrate knowledge types, debate futures, and balance technical-medical with societal perspectives. • Methodologically, this can be achieved particularly well through design-based and participatory processes.

Technology in SocietyVol. 82
Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (DE), Berenson Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (US), Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha (ES), Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (ES), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE), Monash University (AU), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Australian Government, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.