Science and Practice of Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities: Kind Conversations About a Wicked Problem

Although specific learning disabilities (SLD) represent the largest category for which school-age children receive special education services, the science and practice of SLD identification continues to evade consensus. Our goal is to bring together trainers and researchers with different perspectives on SLD identification to help spur a move toward a potential consensus, discuss agreements and disagreements on SLD identification in the field including amongst ourselves, and work toward productive discussion that may help move the field forward. We review essential conceptual questions that require greater scrutiny and thought to build a stronger understanding of SLD. We then discuss current assessment and identification practices, focusing on the not-so-controversial and the controversial issues in the field. Finally, we conclude with questions and considerations that challenge many of the established assumptions and systems currently in place. The aim of this article is to support constructive discussion on the topic of SLD that may have profound effects on the perennial issues the field continues to face.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251328205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science and Practice of Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities: Kind Conversations About a Wicked Problem

Christopher R. Niileksela, Ryan J. McGill, Kathrin E. Maki, Daniel B. Hajovsky
1 citations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
article

Science and Practice of Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities: Kind Conversations About a Wicked Problem

Christopher R. Niileksela, Ryan J. McGill, Kathrin E. Maki, Daniel B. Hajovsky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although specific learning disabilities (SLD) represent the largest category for which school-age children receive special education services, the science and practice of SLD identification continues to evade consensus. Our goal is to bring together trainers and researchers with different perspectives on SLD identification to help spur a move toward a potential consensus, discuss agreements and disagreements on SLD identification in the field including amongst ourselves, and work toward productive discussion that may help move the field forward. We review essential conceptual questions that require greater scrutiny and thought to build a stronger understanding of SLD. We then discuss current assessment and identification practices, focusing on the not-so-controversial and the controversial issues in the field. Finally, we conclude with questions and considerations that challenge many of the established assumptions and systems currently in place. The aim of this article is to support constructive discussion on the topic of SLD that may have profound effects on the perennial issues the field continues to face.

Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentVol. 43(4)
University of Kansas (US), William & Mary (US), Williams (United States) (US), University of Florida (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.