The Impacts of the Sanitation Campaign on Improving Living Environments: Evidence From Rural China

ABSTRACT To narrow the gap in living environments between rural and urban areas, the Chinese government launched a nationwide sanitation campaign to improve the rural living environment. This paper uses rural household survey data and employs an econometric approach to evaluate the various effects of this top‐down sanitation campaign. The empirical results indicate that the environmental benefits of the sanitation campaign are statistically significant, whereas the short‐term health and income effects are not. Villages completing the sanitation campaign (or with higher completion scores) enjoy a relatively better living environment: a statistically significant decline in the probability of having household waste, domestic sewage and human and animal excrement (odour) near homes. In addition, we also find that rural sanitation campaigns stimulate environmentally friendly behaviours of rural residents. JEL Classification: P28, P25, Q52

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impacts of the Sanitation Campaign on Improving Living Environments: Evidence From Rural China

Qingen Gai, Xiong Xiao, Chengzheng Li
1 citations
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Child Nutrition and Water Access
1.12
article

The Impacts of the Sanitation Campaign on Improving Living Environments: Evidence From Rural China

Qingen Gai, Xiong Xiao, Chengzheng Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT To narrow the gap in living environments between rural and urban areas, the Chinese government launched a nationwide sanitation campaign to improve the rural living environment. This paper uses rural household survey data and employs an econometric approach to evaluate the various effects of this top‐down sanitation campaign. The empirical results indicate that the environmental benefits of the sanitation campaign are statistically significant, whereas the short‐term health and income effects are not. Villages completing the sanitation campaign (or with higher completion scores) enjoy a relatively better living environment: a statistically significant decline in the probability of having household waste, domestic sewage and human and animal excrement (odour) near homes. In addition, we also find that rural sanitation campaigns stimulate environmentally friendly behaviours of rural residents. JEL Classification: P28, P25, Q52

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsVol. 69(3)
Jinan University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, National Social Science Fund of China, Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impacts of the Sanitation Campaign on Improving Living Environments: Evidence From Rural China — Qingen Gai, Xiong Xiao, et al. · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS