Moral Machine Learning: Teaching a Course at the Intersection of Applied Statistics and Moral Philosophy

Statistical applications are increasingly inducing ethical considerations, which are often not able to be resolved via statistics alone.In this article, we present a proposed course that combines applied statistics and moral philosophy.The instructional methods included are designed with implementation at a large research institution in mind but are fully intended to be transferable to any setting adopting such an interdisciplinary course into its curriculum.The aforementioned methods will foreground case-studies as tangible examples in a recurrent workflow involving identification of a dilemma, statistical analysis, philosophical defense, and application to the particular case study.Formative and summative assessment mechanisms will be presented alongside future directions and potential pitfalls of such a course.Motivating the proposed course is a desire to fill the comparative void in moral reasoning for statistics and data science curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2025.2485239
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Machine Learning: Teaching a Course at the Intersection of Applied Statistics and Moral Philosophy

Andrew Ackerman
Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Moral Machine Learning: Teaching a Course at the Intersection of Applied Statistics and Moral Philosophy

Andrew Ackerman
article en

Abstract

Statistical applications are increasingly inducing ethical considerations, which are often not able to be resolved via statistics alone.In this article, we present a proposed course that combines applied statistics and moral philosophy.The instructional methods included are designed with implementation at a large research institution in mind but are fully intended to be transferable to any setting adopting such an interdisciplinary course into its curriculum.The aforementioned methods will foreground case-studies as tangible examples in a recurrent workflow involving identification of a dilemma, statistical analysis, philosophical defense, and application to the particular case study.Formative and summative assessment mechanisms will be presented alongside future directions and potential pitfalls of such a course.Motivating the proposed course is a desire to fill the comparative void in moral reasoning for statistics and data science curricula.

Journal of Statistics and Data Science EducationVol. 33(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Moral Machine Learning: Teaching a Course at the Intersection of Applied Statistics and Moral Philosophy — Andrew Ackerman · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS