Legal Certainty of The Independence of The Prosecutor's Office In Indonesia

The position of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia has not been explicitly regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, resulting in inconsistencies related to the independence of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, which in existence the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is positioned to be part of the Judicial Power as well as part of the government (executive) institution. This has an impact on the weak position of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in carrying out its function as a prosecution institution in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal certainty of the constitutional regulation of the independence of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in Indonesia. In the research, the type of research used is a type of research with normative legal research methods. The conclusion in this study is that the independence of the Prosecutor's Office is needed for the benefit of law enforcement by being honest, fair, responsible, and transparent by upholding the principle of fair trial in the principle of equality before the law. Thus, this must be carried out because the prosecutor's institution is a determining factor in the sub-system of legal structure in criminal law enforcement. On the other hand, the constitutional reconstruction of the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia should be important, considering that until now the arrangements related to the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia have not been implicitly regulated. This has an impact on the independence of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia which until now is still positioned as part of the judicial power as well as part of the government (executive) institution on the other hand. The constitutional reconstruction of the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia can refer to the Constitution of Myanmar and Laos, which in its constitution formulates the regulation of the position, war/function, appointment and removal of the Attorney General in their respective constitutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Social Research
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i4.2510
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Certainty of The Independence of The Prosecutor's Office In Indonesia

Ngurah Wahyu Resta
Journal Of Social Research
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Legal Certainty of The Independence of The Prosecutor's Office In Indonesia

Ngurah Wahyu Resta
article en

Abstract

The position of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia has not been explicitly regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, resulting in inconsistencies related to the independence of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, which in existence the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is positioned to be part of the Judicial Power as well as part of the government (executive) institution. This has an impact on the weak position of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in carrying out its function as a prosecution institution in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal certainty of the constitutional regulation of the independence of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in Indonesia. In the research, the type of research used is a type of research with normative legal research methods. The conclusion in this study is that the independence of the Prosecutor's Office is needed for the benefit of law enforcement by being honest, fair, responsible, and transparent by upholding the principle of fair trial in the principle of equality before the law. Thus, this must be carried out because the prosecutor's institution is a determining factor in the sub-system of legal structure in criminal law enforcement. On the other hand, the constitutional reconstruction of the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia should be important, considering that until now the arrangements related to the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia have not been implicitly regulated. This has an impact on the independence of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia which until now is still positioned as part of the judicial power as well as part of the government (executive) institution on the other hand. The constitutional reconstruction of the position of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia can refer to the Constitution of Myanmar and Laos, which in its constitution formulates the regulation of the position, war/function, appointment and removal of the Attorney General in their respective constitutions.

Journal Of Social ResearchVol. 4(4)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal Certainty of The Independence of The Prosecutor's Office In Indonesia — Ngurah Wahyu Resta · Journal Of Social Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS