Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Mapping the Landscape of Scientific Publication

Background Research trends in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) rehabilitation remain relatively unexplored within the scientific literature. Despite increasing interest, there is a notable lack of comprehensive bibliometric analysis to map and synthesize global research trends in SCI rehabilitation, especially over the last three decades. Materials and Methods We conducted a detailed bibliometric analysis using data extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection and Scopus databases, covering the period from 1993 to 2023. The analysis employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches, utilizing bibliometric software tools such as VOSviewer to examine publication outputs, journals, authors, institutions, countries, cited references, keywords, and emerging terms in the field. Specific attention was given to identifying trends in technological interventions and research frontiers in SCI rehabilitation. Results This study identified 1,377 unique articles for further analysis. The United States emerged as the leading contributor to SCI research, followed by Canada and Australia. Among institutions, the University of Toronto was the most active, with significant contributions also from the University of Groningen and the University of British Columbia. The top research fields in SCI rehabilitation were Neuroscience and Neurology, followed by Sports Science and General and Internal Medicine. Additionally, this study highlighted key thematic areas shaping the field, including recovery and function, social and psychological aspects, neurological and medical complications, assessment and measurement, and psychological well-being. Conclusion This bibliometric study underscores SCI rehabilitation as a mature and expanding research field with significant global collaboration. However, there is a pressing need for higher-quality research to further advance the field. Our findings offer valuable insights for researchers to shape future research directions and enhance the impact of SCI rehabilitation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientometric Research
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251114
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Mapping the Landscape of Scientific Publication

Hafifi Hisham, Nur Azah Hamzaid, Sumaiyah Mat, Asfarina Zanudin et al.
2 citations
Journal of Scientometric Research
Spinal Cord Injury Research
2.94
article

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Mapping the Landscape of Scientific Publication

Hafifi Hisham, Nur Azah Hamzaid, Sumaiyah Mat, Asfarina Zanudin, Azliyana Azizan, Winslet Ong, Nor Azlin Mohd Nordin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background Research trends in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) rehabilitation remain relatively unexplored within the scientific literature. Despite increasing interest, there is a notable lack of comprehensive bibliometric analysis to map and synthesize global research trends in SCI rehabilitation, especially over the last three decades. Materials and Methods We conducted a detailed bibliometric analysis using data extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection and Scopus databases, covering the period from 1993 to 2023. The analysis employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches, utilizing bibliometric software tools such as VOSviewer to examine publication outputs, journals, authors, institutions, countries, cited references, keywords, and emerging terms in the field. Specific attention was given to identifying trends in technological interventions and research frontiers in SCI rehabilitation. Results This study identified 1,377 unique articles for further analysis. The United States emerged as the leading contributor to SCI research, followed by Canada and Australia. Among institutions, the University of Toronto was the most active, with significant contributions also from the University of Groningen and the University of British Columbia. The top research fields in SCI rehabilitation were Neuroscience and Neurology, followed by Sports Science and General and Internal Medicine. Additionally, this study highlighted key thematic areas shaping the field, including recovery and function, social and psychological aspects, neurological and medical complications, assessment and measurement, and psychological well-being. Conclusion This bibliometric study underscores SCI rehabilitation as a mature and expanding research field with significant global collaboration. However, there is a pressing need for higher-quality research to further advance the field. Our findings offer valuable insights for researchers to shape future research directions and enhance the impact of SCI rehabilitation studies.

Journal of Scientometric ResearchVol. 14(1)
University of Malaya (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.