Understanding Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction

Timestamps play a pivotal role in digital forensic event reconstruction, but due to their non-essential nature, tampering or manipulation of timestamps is possible by users in multiple ways, even on running systems. This has a significant effect on the reliability of the results from applying a timeline analysis as part of an investigation. We investigate the problem of users tampering with timestamps on a running (“live”) system. While prior work has shown that digital evidence tampering is hard, we focus on the question of why this is so. By performing a qualitative user study with advanced university students, we derive factors that influence the reliability of successful tampering, such as the individual knowledge about temporal traces, and technical restrictions to change them. These insights help to assess the reliability of timestamps from individual artifacts that are used for event reconstruction and subsequently reduce the risk of misinterpretations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3712716.3712727
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction

Christopher J. Hargreaves, Jan Gruber, Felix Freiling, Zinaida Benenson et al.
5 citations
Digital and Cyber Forensics
16.23
article

Understanding Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction

Christopher J. Hargreaves, Jan Gruber, Felix Freiling, Zinaida Benenson, Frank Breitinger, Céline Vanini
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Timestamps play a pivotal role in digital forensic event reconstruction, but due to their non-essential nature, tampering or manipulation of timestamps is possible by users in multiple ways, even on running systems. This has a significant effect on the reliability of the results from applying a timeline analysis as part of an investigation. We investigate the problem of users tampering with timestamps on a running (“live”) system. While prior work has shown that digital evidence tampering is hard, we focus on the question of why this is so. By performing a qualitative user study with advanced university students, we derive factors that influence the reliability of successful tampering, such as the individual knowledge about temporal traces, and technical restrictions to change them. These insights help to assess the reliability of timestamps from individual artifacts that are used for event reconstruction and subsequently reduce the risk of misinterpretations.

University of Augsburg (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Oxford (GB), University of Lausanne (CH)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
16.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding Strategies and Challenges of Timestamp Tampering for Improved Digital Forensic Event Reconstruction — Christopher J. Hargreaves, Jan Gruber, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS