AutoDFBench: A Framework for AI Generated Digital Forensic Code and Tool Testing and Evaluation

Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) show great potential in various domains, including digital forensics. A notable use case of these technologies is automatic code generation, which can reasonably be expected to include digital forensic applications in the not-too-distant future. As with any digital forensic tool, these systems must undergo extensive testing and validation. However, manually evaluating outputs, including generated DF code, remains a challenge. AutoDFBench is an automated framework designed to address this by validating AI-generated code and tools against NIST’s Computer Forensics Tool Testing Program (CFTT) procedures and subsequently calculating an AutoDFBench benchmarking score. The framework operates in four phases: data preparation, API handling, code execution, and result recording with score calculation. It benchmarks generative AI systems, such as LLMs and automated code generation agents, for DF applications. This benchmark can support iterative development or serve as a comparison metric between GenAI DF systems. As a proof of concept, NIST’s forensic string search tests were used, involving more than 24,200 tests with five top-performing code generation LLMs. These tests validated the output of 121 cases, considering two levels of user expertise, two programming languages, and ten iterations per case with varying prompts. The results also highlight the significant limitations of the DF-specific solutions generated by generic LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3712716.3712718
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AutoDFBench: A Framework for AI Generated Digital Forensic Code and Tool Testing and Evaluation

Mark Scanlon, Frank Breitinger, Hudan Studiawan, Akila Wickramasekara et al.
2 citations
Digital and Cyber Forensics
6.49
article

AutoDFBench: A Framework for AI Generated Digital Forensic Code and Tool Testing and Evaluation

Mark Scanlon, Frank Breitinger, Hudan Studiawan, Akila Wickramasekara, A. Densmore
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) show great potential in various domains, including digital forensics. A notable use case of these technologies is automatic code generation, which can reasonably be expected to include digital forensic applications in the not-too-distant future. As with any digital forensic tool, these systems must undergo extensive testing and validation. However, manually evaluating outputs, including generated DF code, remains a challenge. AutoDFBench is an automated framework designed to address this by validating AI-generated code and tools against NIST’s Computer Forensics Tool Testing Program (CFTT) procedures and subsequently calculating an AutoDFBench benchmarking score. The framework operates in four phases: data preparation, API handling, code execution, and result recording with score calculation. It benchmarks generative AI systems, such as LLMs and automated code generation agents, for DF applications. This benchmark can support iterative development or serve as a comparison metric between GenAI DF systems. As a proof of concept, NIST’s forensic string search tests were used, involving more than 24,200 tests with five top-performing code generation LLMs. These tests validated the output of 121 cases, considering two levels of user expertise, two programming languages, and ten iterations per case with varying prompts. The results also highlight the significant limitations of the DF-specific solutions generated by generic LLMs.

University College Dublin (IE), Florida State University (US), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ID), University of Augsburg (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.