Estimating Required Sample Sizes for Gut Content Metabarcoding Studies of Dietary Diversity in Spiders

ABSTRACT Spiders are dominant predators in terrestrial ecosystems, regulating invertebrate biomass, diversity and abundance through predation. However, analysing predation patterns in the field is challenging, especially as spiders are extra‐intestinal liquid feeders and often active at night. Gut content metabarcoding (GCM) provides a cost‐effective method to study the prey composition of spiders. In this study, we determine the minimum sample size of spider specimens required to obtain representative estimates of local prey composition. Six common spider species were studied using GCM, and we show that the number of analysed individuals per spider species influenced the sampling completeness for prey at different taxonomic levels. To achieve 90% sampling completeness at the prey species level, between 50 and over 150 individuals per spider species had to be analysed, which is challenging for ecological multi‐site studies. Hence, we argue for consideration of coarser taxonomic levels, such as family or order, which often provide sufficient ecological information to understand predator–prey interactions. At these levels, sampling completeness can be achieved with much smaller sample sizes of four to eight individuals per species, making ecological GCM studies more cost‐effective. These results highlight the benefits of considering the taxonomic resolution in metabarcoding studies to address ecological research questions. We further provide information that will facilitate future investigations of predator–prey dynamics, not just in spiders but also in other extra‐intestinal liquid feeders like, for example, ground beetles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Entomology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.13433
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Required Sample Sizes for Gut Content Metabarcoding Studies of Dietary Diversity in Spiders

Klaus Birkhofer, Henrik Krehenwinkel, Anja Melcher, Danilo Harms
1 links
Journal of Applied Entomology
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Estimating Required Sample Sizes for Gut Content Metabarcoding Studies of Dietary Diversity in Spiders

Klaus Birkhofer, Henrik Krehenwinkel, Anja Melcher, Danilo Harms
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spiders are dominant predators in terrestrial ecosystems, regulating invertebrate biomass, diversity and abundance through predation. However, analysing predation patterns in the field is challenging, especially as spiders are extra‐intestinal liquid feeders and often active at night. Gut content metabarcoding (GCM) provides a cost‐effective method to study the prey composition of spiders. In this study, we determine the minimum sample size of spider specimens required to obtain representative estimates of local prey composition. Six common spider species were studied using GCM, and we show that the number of analysed individuals per spider species influenced the sampling completeness for prey at different taxonomic levels. To achieve 90% sampling completeness at the prey species level, between 50 and over 150 individuals per spider species had to be analysed, which is challenging for ecological multi‐site studies. Hence, we argue for consideration of coarser taxonomic levels, such as family or order, which often provide sufficient ecological information to understand predator–prey interactions. At these levels, sampling completeness can be achieved with much smaller sample sizes of four to eight individuals per species, making ecological GCM studies more cost‐effective. These results highlight the benefits of considering the taxonomic resolution in metabarcoding studies to address ecological research questions. We further provide information that will facilitate future investigations of predator–prey dynamics, not just in spiders but also in other extra‐intestinal liquid feeders like, for example, ground beetles.

Journal of Applied EntomologyVol. 149(7)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (DE), Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.