Consistency and Validity of Participatory Science Data: A Comparison of Seasonality Patterns of Northern California and Nevada Birds Across eBird and iNaturalist

Participatory science platforms like iNaturalist and eBird support large, engaged communities of observers who produce substantial amounts of biodiversity data. Despite similarities across platforms, their participants are quite distinct in profile (e.g., hobbyists versus enthusiasts) and contribute data in different manners, frequencies, and magnitudes, raising questions about platform-specific biases and whether combining species-level data across platforms is advisable. This study establishes a methodology for assessing mergeability of observation records from iNaturalist and eBird using relative temporal distributions. Specifically, we employed circular statistical methods to compare seasonality patterns using records from 254 bird species in Northern California and Nevada during 2019 and 2022. We developed a circular optimal transport-based test to assess statistical equivalence of frequency distributions within species across platforms and years. Using eBird 2022 as a baseline, we found that over 97% of species were mergeable from eBird 2019 and iNaturalist 2022 datasets, and over 88% of species were mergeable using iNaturalist 2019 records. Subsequent comparison of combined data revealed archetypal seasonality patterns that matched known migratory behaviors or otherwise exhibited discrepancies explainable with expert knowledge about observer and bird behavior. Our findings provide quantitative evidence to suggest that only a small minority of species in our study exhibit major differences that prevent them from being reasonably integrated across platforms, and our approach highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in analyzing participatory science data. These results indicate transformative potential for participatory science projects small and large to contribute to broadscale analyses by organizing and pooling data across projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.825
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consistency and Validity of Participatory Science Data: A Comparison of Seasonality Patterns of Northern California and Nevada Birds Across eBird and iNaturalist

Robert E. Furrow, Cody Carroll, Laci Gerhart
2 citations
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
article

Consistency and Validity of Participatory Science Data: A Comparison of Seasonality Patterns of Northern California and Nevada Birds Across eBird and iNaturalist

Robert E. Furrow, Cody Carroll, Laci Gerhart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Participatory science platforms like iNaturalist and eBird support large, engaged communities of observers who produce substantial amounts of biodiversity data. Despite similarities across platforms, their participants are quite distinct in profile (e.g., hobbyists versus enthusiasts) and contribute data in different manners, frequencies, and magnitudes, raising questions about platform-specific biases and whether combining species-level data across platforms is advisable. This study establishes a methodology for assessing mergeability of observation records from iNaturalist and eBird using relative temporal distributions. Specifically, we employed circular statistical methods to compare seasonality patterns using records from 254 bird species in Northern California and Nevada during 2019 and 2022. We developed a circular optimal transport-based test to assess statistical equivalence of frequency distributions within species across platforms and years. Using eBird 2022 as a baseline, we found that over 97% of species were mergeable from eBird 2019 and iNaturalist 2022 datasets, and over 88% of species were mergeable using iNaturalist 2019 records. Subsequent comparison of combined data revealed archetypal seasonality patterns that matched known migratory behaviors or otherwise exhibited discrepancies explainable with expert knowledge about observer and bird behavior. Our findings provide quantitative evidence to suggest that only a small minority of species in our study exhibit major differences that prevent them from being reasonably integrated across platforms, and our approach highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in analyzing participatory science data. These results indicate transformative potential for participatory science projects small and large to contribute to broadscale analyses by organizing and pooling data across projects.

Citizen Science Theory and PracticeVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.