RESEARCH PAPER: DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) for diagnosing acute appendicitis against histopathology as the reference standard. Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies due to the potential risk of complications including perforation, abscess formation, and sepsis. However, diagnosing it is not easy because its symptoms are vague, and this has given rise to systems such as the MAS. In this cross-sectional study carried out at Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan, 179 of consumers were administered the MAS and surgically treated for appendectomy for histopathological confirmation. The study showed that the MAS had a good sensitivity of 83.3% and moderate specificity of 72.2% in diagnosing acute appendicitis, a positive predictive value of 86.7 and a negative predictive value of 68.9 %. Subgroup analysis illustrated that the diagnostic accuracy of the MAS was higher in the 18–30 years age group and males and slightly lower in the older age and females. Moreover, using diagnostic accuracy as a measure, the outcome was significantly affected by SES: the middle-SES group had the highest performance. The findings of the study enhance the utilization of MAS as a simple and non-invasive approach to diagnosing appendicitis, particularly in resource-challenged areas where imaging is rare. However, the moderate

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/c5hmpc72
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESEARCH PAPER: DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Saad Syed, D. Khan
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

RESEARCH PAPER: DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD

Saad Syed, D. Khan
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) for diagnosing acute appendicitis against histopathology as the reference standard. Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies due to the potential risk of complications including perforation, abscess formation, and sepsis. However, diagnosing it is not easy because its symptoms are vague, and this has given rise to systems such as the MAS. In this cross-sectional study carried out at Mardan Medical Complex in Mardan, Pakistan, 179 of consumers were administered the MAS and surgically treated for appendectomy for histopathological confirmation. The study showed that the MAS had a good sensitivity of 83.3% and moderate specificity of 72.2% in diagnosing acute appendicitis, a positive predictive value of 86.7 and a negative predictive value of 68.9 %. Subgroup analysis illustrated that the diagnostic accuracy of the MAS was higher in the 18–30 years age group and males and slightly lower in the older age and females. Moreover, using diagnostic accuracy as a measure, the outcome was significantly affected by SES: the middle-SES group had the highest performance. The findings of the study enhance the utilization of MAS as a simple and non-invasive approach to diagnosing appendicitis, particularly in resource-challenged areas where imaging is rare. However, the moderate

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 2(1)
Ayub Medical College (PK), Khyber Medical College (PK), Women Medical College (PK), Abbott (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.