Valuing community health workers (CHWs): Opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending among CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> In the Indonesian stunting prevention program, the often non-salaried community health workers (CHWs) are responsible for monthly monitoring, counseling, and home visits. Understanding the importance of their roles from an economic perspective may inform a more sustainable and improved program delivery. <h3>Aim</h3> To estimate the opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending incurred by the CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program. <h3>Methods</h3> This cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural villages in Lombok, Indonesia. We interviewed 130 CHWs with a pre-validated, structured questionnaire. Opportunity costs were assessed using two valuation models: calculating their working time valuation based on regional minimum wage and the CHWs' self-reported earnings outside of their community health work. <h3>Results</h3> We found that 52·31 % of the CHWs were not satisfied with the current incentivization scheme. Opportunity cost calculation shows that these CHWs were underpaid: reported monthly workload is valued at USD 46·54 according to the valuation model based on regional minimum wage and USD 13·81 based on CHWs self-reported income. Furthermore, out-of-pocket spending reached almost one-third of the received incentives (median USD 2.90 (IQR 0·87–4·95)). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Appropriately incentivizing CHWs working on stunting prevention programs in Indonesia is one of the main priorities to ensure better program delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuing community health workers (CHWs): Opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending among CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program

Maritta Rastuti, Zack Petersen, Trio Sirmareza, Ryan Rachmad Nugraha et al.
1 citations
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
1.12
article

Valuing community health workers (CHWs): Opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending among CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program

Maritta Rastuti, Zack Petersen, Trio Sirmareza, Ryan Rachmad Nugraha, Adriana Viola Miranda, Rindang Asmara, Rizky Deco Praha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> In the Indonesian stunting prevention program, the often non-salaried community health workers (CHWs) are responsible for monthly monitoring, counseling, and home visits. Understanding the importance of their roles from an economic perspective may inform a more sustainable and improved program delivery. <h3>Aim</h3> To estimate the opportunity costs and out-of-pocket spending incurred by the CHWs in the Indonesian stunting prevention program. <h3>Methods</h3> This cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural villages in Lombok, Indonesia. We interviewed 130 CHWs with a pre-validated, structured questionnaire. Opportunity costs were assessed using two valuation models: calculating their working time valuation based on regional minimum wage and the CHWs' self-reported earnings outside of their community health work. <h3>Results</h3> We found that 52·31 % of the CHWs were not satisfied with the current incentivization scheme. Opportunity cost calculation shows that these CHWs were underpaid: reported monthly workload is valued at USD 46·54 according to the valuation model based on regional minimum wage and USD 13·81 based on CHWs self-reported income. Furthermore, out-of-pocket spending reached almost one-third of the received incentives (median USD 2.90 (IQR 0·87–4·95)). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Appropriately incentivizing CHWs working on stunting prevention programs in Indonesia is one of the main priorities to ensure better program delivery.

Clinical Epidemiology and Global HealthVol. 33
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), WWF-Indonesia (ID)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.