Influence of Professional Materials on the Decision-Making of Preservice Secondary Teachers When Noticing Students’ Mathematical Thinking

This research aims to investigate the impact of professional materials’ interpretation on the decision-making of preservice secondary teachers when analyzing the mathematical thinking of a 15–16-year-old high school student engaged in arithmetic problem-solving. Our conceptual framework considers the model of curricular noticing and the specific model of noticing students’ mathematical thinking, establishing connections between both. The participants were 20 preservice teachers taking part in a training program in two Spanish universities. They were grouped randomly into five groups. The data were preservice secondary teachers’ written responses to a professional task of noticing students’ mathematical thinking by solving two arithmetic problems. A qualitative analysis was carried out considering the skills that make up the theoretical models considered. Findings show that the various interpretations made by the preservice secondary teachers of the professional materials gave rise to different interpretations of the secondary school student’s error and this led them to propose different instructional responses. There were two groups focused on a relational interpretation and three focused on a procedural interpretation (and response). We conclude that the way in which secondary school student teachers begin to make sense of professional materials is influenced by their experiences, background, and beliefs about mathematics teaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040418
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Professional Materials on the Decision-Making of Preservice Secondary Teachers When Noticing Students’ Mathematical Thinking

Gloria Sánchez-Matamoros, Mar Moreno, Julia Valls González
2 citations
Education Sciences
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
17.85
article

Influence of Professional Materials on the Decision-Making of Preservice Secondary Teachers When Noticing Students’ Mathematical Thinking

Gloria Sánchez-Matamoros, Mar Moreno, Julia Valls González
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the impact of professional materials’ interpretation on the decision-making of preservice secondary teachers when analyzing the mathematical thinking of a 15–16-year-old high school student engaged in arithmetic problem-solving. Our conceptual framework considers the model of curricular noticing and the specific model of noticing students’ mathematical thinking, establishing connections between both. The participants were 20 preservice teachers taking part in a training program in two Spanish universities. They were grouped randomly into five groups. The data were preservice secondary teachers’ written responses to a professional task of noticing students’ mathematical thinking by solving two arithmetic problems. A qualitative analysis was carried out considering the skills that make up the theoretical models considered. Findings show that the various interpretations made by the preservice secondary teachers of the professional materials gave rise to different interpretations of the secondary school student’s error and this led them to propose different instructional responses. There were two groups focused on a relational interpretation and three focused on a procedural interpretation (and response). We conclude that the way in which secondary school student teachers begin to make sense of professional materials is influenced by their experiences, background, and beliefs about mathematics teaching.

Education SciencesVol. 15(4)
University of Alicante (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.