Impact of Pupil-Decentration on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Patients Undergoing High Astigmatic PRK Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of myopic patients undergoing high astigmatic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery with and without pupillary decentration of treatment. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of myopic patients who underwent PRK surgery for high astigmatism (>3 diopters [D]) between January 2013 and December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the surgeon applied pupillary decentration during surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups. Adjustments were made to account for differences in baseline characteristics and intraoperative parameters. <b>Results</b>: Overall, the study included 575 eyes from 414 patients, of which 79 eyes were treated with pupil decentration. The pupil-decentered group exhibited significantly preoperative higher myopia (subjective spherical equivalent (SEQ) of -5.30 ± 3.12 D vs. -4.26 ± 2.45 D, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and subjective sphere (-3.40 ± 3.13 D vs. -2.31 ± 2.49 D, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Visual and refractive outcomes, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of logMAR 0.11 ± 0.77 vs. 0.09 ± 0.72 (<i>p</i> = 0.302), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.07 ± 0.92 vs. 0.07 ± 0.82 (<i>p</i> = 0.982), SEQ (-0.33 ± 0.93 vs. -0.19 ± 0.60D, <i>p</i> = 0.094), sphere (0.02 ± 0.98 vs. 0.15 ± 0.67 D, <i>p</i> = 0.142), cylinder (-0.71 ± 0.48 vs. -0.70 ± 0.55 D, <i>p</i> = 0.894), safety index (1.07 ± 0.27 vs. 1.12 ± 0.31, <i>p</i> = 0.236), and efficacy index (0.99 ± 0.31 vs. 1.07 ± 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.065), showed no significant differences between the two groups. Postoperative outcomes remained comparable after adjusting for baseline and intraoperative parameters. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings suggest that, in myopic patients undergoing high-astigmatic PRK surgery, pupil decentration does not lead to superior postoperative visual and refractive outcomes. This highlights that, in this scenario, surgeons can preserve the efficacy and safety of the procedure even without applying pupil decentration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072282
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Pupil-Decentration on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Patients Undergoing High Astigmatic PRK Surgery

Dror Ben Ephraim Noyman, Tzahi Sela, Michael Mimouni, Eyal Cohen‬‏ et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Impact of Pupil-Decentration on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Patients Undergoing High Astigmatic PRK Surgery

Dror Ben Ephraim Noyman, Tzahi Sela, Michael Mimouni, Eyal Cohen‬‏, Igor Kaiserman, Waseem Nasser, Adir Sommer, Gur Munzer, Margarita Safir
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of myopic patients undergoing high astigmatic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery with and without pupillary decentration of treatment. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of myopic patients who underwent PRK surgery for high astigmatism (>3 diopters [D]) between January 2013 and December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether the surgeon applied pupillary decentration during surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups. Adjustments were made to account for differences in baseline characteristics and intraoperative parameters. <b>Results</b>: Overall, the study included 575 eyes from 414 patients, of which 79 eyes were treated with pupil decentration. The pupil-decentered group exhibited significantly preoperative higher myopia (subjective spherical equivalent (SEQ) of -5.30 ± 3.12 D vs. -4.26 ± 2.45 D, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and subjective sphere (-3.40 ± 3.13 D vs. -2.31 ± 2.49 D, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Visual and refractive outcomes, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of logMAR 0.11 ± 0.77 vs. 0.09 ± 0.72 (<i>p</i> = 0.302), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.07 ± 0.92 vs. 0.07 ± 0.82 (<i>p</i> = 0.982), SEQ (-0.33 ± 0.93 vs. -0.19 ± 0.60D, <i>p</i> = 0.094), sphere (0.02 ± 0.98 vs. 0.15 ± 0.67 D, <i>p</i> = 0.142), cylinder (-0.71 ± 0.48 vs. -0.70 ± 0.55 D, <i>p</i> = 0.894), safety index (1.07 ± 0.27 vs. 1.12 ± 0.31, <i>p</i> = 0.236), and efficacy index (0.99 ± 0.31 vs. 1.07 ± 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.065), showed no significant differences between the two groups. Postoperative outcomes remained comparable after adjusting for baseline and intraoperative parameters. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings suggest that, in myopic patients undergoing high-astigmatic PRK surgery, pupil decentration does not lead to superior postoperative visual and refractive outcomes. This highlights that, in this scenario, surgeons can preserve the efficacy and safety of the procedure even without applying pupil decentration.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(7)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Barzilai Medical Center (IL), Notal Vision (Israel) (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.