Is Copper-61 the New Gallium-68? Automation and Preclinical Proof-of-Concept of 61Cu-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer Imaging

<b>Background:</b> While gallium-68 has traditionally dominated PET imaging in oncology, copper radionuclides have sparked interest for their potential applications in nuclear medicine and theranostics. Considering the advantageous physical decay properties of copper-61 compared to those of gallium-68, we describe a fully automated GMP-compliant synthesis process for ⁶¹Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals and demonstrate their in vivo application for targeting the overexpressed PSMA by PET/MR imaging. <b>Methods:</b> Copper-61 was obtained through the irradiation of natural zinc liquid targets in a biomedical cyclotron. [⁶¹Cu]Cu-DOTAGA-PSMA-I&T and [⁶¹Cu]Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-I&T were produced without manual intervention in two Synthera^® Extension modules. Radiochemical purity was analyzed by radio-HPLC and iTLC. Cellular uptake was evaluated in LNCaP and DU145 cells. In vivo PET/MRI was performed in control mice to evaluate the biodistribution of both radiopharmaceuticals, and in tumor-bearing mice to assess the targeting ability towards PSMA. <b>Results:</b> The fully automated process developed proved to be effective for the synthesis of ⁶¹Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals, with appropriate molar activities. The final products exhibited high radiochemical purity (>98%) and remained stable for up to 6 h after the EOS. A time-dependent increase in cellular uptake was observed in LNCaP cells, but not in DU145 cells. As opposed to [⁶¹Cu]Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-I&T, [⁶¹Cu]Cu-DOTAGA-PSMA-I&T exhibited poor kinetic stability in vivo. Subsequent PET/MR imaging with [⁶¹Cu]Cu-NODAGA-PSMA-I&T showed tumor uptake lasting up to 4 h post-injection, predominant renal clearance, and no detectable accumulation in non-targeted organs. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results demonstrate the feasibility of the implemented process, which yields adequate amounts of high-quality radiopharmaceuticals and can be adapted to any standard production facility. This streamlined approach enhances reproducibility and scalability, bringing copper-61 closer to widespread clinical use, to the detriment of the conventionally accepted gallium-68.