Global Human Rights Sanctions: How Can They Contribute to Addressing Mass Atrocities?

Global Human Rights Sanctions (GHRS) have been used in over 30 countries as a mechanism for imposing unilateral human rights sanctions on individual perpetrators. Despite the hundreds of specific sanctions that have been imposed globally, there remains a lack of understanding about how these measures function on gross human rights violations. This article seeks to explore how GHRS, as an emerging human rights mechanism, contributes to addressing mass atrocities. I categorize the functions of GHRS into two phases: post-atrocity and pre-atrocity. In the post-atrocity phase, I identify three primary objectives asserted by sanctioning states: punishing perpetrators, promoting behavioral change, and providing compensation to victims. In the pre-atrocity phase, I introduce the Swiss Cheese Model to illustrate the deterrent effect of GHRS, emphasizing their unique role in preventing and addressing mass atrocities compared to other human rights mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genocide Studies and Prevention
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.18.2.1977
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Human Rights Sanctions: How Can They Contribute to Addressing Mass Atrocities?

Yifan Jia
1 citations
Genocide Studies and Prevention
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
2.23
article

Global Human Rights Sanctions: How Can They Contribute to Addressing Mass Atrocities?

Yifan Jia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Global Human Rights Sanctions (GHRS) have been used in over 30 countries as a mechanism for imposing unilateral human rights sanctions on individual perpetrators. Despite the hundreds of specific sanctions that have been imposed globally, there remains a lack of understanding about how these measures function on gross human rights violations. This article seeks to explore how GHRS, as an emerging human rights mechanism, contributes to addressing mass atrocities. I categorize the functions of GHRS into two phases: post-atrocity and pre-atrocity. In the post-atrocity phase, I identify three primary objectives asserted by sanctioning states: punishing perpetrators, promoting behavioral change, and providing compensation to victims. In the pre-atrocity phase, I introduce the Swiss Cheese Model to illustrate the deterrent effect of GHRS, emphasizing their unique role in preventing and addressing mass atrocities compared to other human rights mechanisms.

Genocide Studies and PreventionVol. 18(2)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.