The Establishment of an Administrative Court: A Necessity for Resolving Administrative Disputes in the Republic of Kosovo

Background: Judicial control of public administration plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality of the administration's activities and good governance. This scientific paper aims to examine the current situation of judicial control of the public administration of the Republic of Kosovo and provide a comparative analysis of the legal framework of judicial control of public administration in the countries of the region. This paper aims to answer the following questions: How far has the Basic Court in Pristina managed to decide on the legality of acts and actions of public administration authorities? Is establishing the Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to handle administrative matters necessary? The establishment of the Administrative Court would improve judicial control over the legality of the public administration’s work, increase the quality of administration and good governance, and increase citizens' trust in institutions. Methods: In this study, various methodologies were employed, including qualitative, analytical, comparative-legal, descriptive and quantitative (statistical) methods. The qualitative research method analyses the Constitution, laws, by-laws, and other documents. The comparative legal method was applied when comparing provisions in the administrative dispute legislation in the countries of the region. Statistical methods have been used during the study of the annual reports of the Kosovo Judicial Council and the Courts, as well as in the empirical part of the paper. Results and Conclusions: The research and analysis findings conclude that establishing administrative courts in the Republic of Kosovo is necessary for resolving administrative issues. The results provide insights that the existence of only one department at the Basic Court in Pristina with "jurisdiction" for the entire territory of the Republic of Kosovo is not the right solution. For this reason, the authors substantiate the necessity of establishing the Administrative Court in the Republic of Kosovo to resolve administrative issues. The Administrative Court of First Instance is based in Pristina, with branches in six major centers of Kosovo, and the Supreme Administrative Court is the second instance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-8.2-a000106
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Establishment of an Administrative Court: A Necessity for Resolving Administrative Disputes in the Republic of Kosovo

Mervete Shala, Xhavit Shala
4 links
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
European and International Law Studies
article

The Establishment of an Administrative Court: A Necessity for Resolving Administrative Disputes in the Republic of Kosovo

Mervete Shala, Xhavit Shala
article en

Abstract

Background: Judicial control of public administration plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality of the administration's activities and good governance. This scientific paper aims to examine the current situation of judicial control of the public administration of the Republic of Kosovo and provide a comparative analysis of the legal framework of judicial control of public administration in the countries of the region. This paper aims to answer the following questions: How far has the Basic Court in Pristina managed to decide on the legality of acts and actions of public administration authorities? Is establishing the Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court to handle administrative matters necessary? The establishment of the Administrative Court would improve judicial control over the legality of the public administration’s work, increase the quality of administration and good governance, and increase citizens' trust in institutions. Methods: In this study, various methodologies were employed, including qualitative, analytical, comparative-legal, descriptive and quantitative (statistical) methods. The qualitative research method analyses the Constitution, laws, by-laws, and other documents. The comparative legal method was applied when comparing provisions in the administrative dispute legislation in the countries of the region. Statistical methods have been used during the study of the annual reports of the Kosovo Judicial Council and the Courts, as well as in the empirical part of the paper. Results and Conclusions: The research and analysis findings conclude that establishing administrative courts in the Republic of Kosovo is necessary for resolving administrative issues. The results provide insights that the existence of only one department at the Basic Court in Pristina with "jurisdiction" for the entire territory of the Republic of Kosovo is not the right solution. For this reason, the authors substantiate the necessity of establishing the Administrative Court in the Republic of Kosovo to resolve administrative issues. The Administrative Court of First Instance is based in Pristina, with branches in six major centers of Kosovo, and the Supreme Administrative Court is the second instance.

Access to Justice in Eastern EuropeVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.