A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence

As cash transfer policies have gained traction in recent years, interest in how financial resources could impact fertility has also grown. Increasing an individual's purchasing power with additional economic resources, such as those provided in unconditional cash transfers, might better enable parents to meet their fertility and reproductive goals, whether those goals are to become pregnant and give birth or to avoid or terminate pregnancies. In this research note, we provide new experimental evidence of the causal impact of a monthly unconditional cash transfer on fertility-related outcomes for U.S. families with at least one young child and low incomes. We find trends of increased pregnancy after three years but no corresponding impacts on births, miscarriages, or terminations. Our findings might indicate that modest cash transfers to mothers with low incomes in the United States are unlikely to have substantial impacts on fertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Demography
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11872728
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence

Sarah Halpern‐Meekin, Kimberly G. Noble, Katherine Magnuson, Greg J. Duncan et al.
1 citations
Demography
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.49
article

A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence

Sarah Halpern‐Meekin, Kimberly G. Noble, Katherine Magnuson, Greg J. Duncan, Lisa A. Gennetian, Molly A. Costanzo, Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Nathan A. Fox
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As cash transfer policies have gained traction in recent years, interest in how financial resources could impact fertility has also grown. Increasing an individual's purchasing power with additional economic resources, such as those provided in unconditional cash transfers, might better enable parents to meet their fertility and reproductive goals, whether those goals are to become pregnant and give birth or to avoid or terminate pregnancies. In this research note, we provide new experimental evidence of the causal impact of a monthly unconditional cash transfer on fertility-related outcomes for U.S. families with at least one young child and low incomes. We find trends of increased pregnancy after three years but no corresponding impacts on births, miscarriages, or terminations. Our findings might indicate that modest cash transfers to mothers with low incomes in the United States are unlikely to have substantial impacts on fertility.

DemographyVol. 62(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Duke University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), New York University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence — Sarah Halpern‐Meekin, Kimberly G. Noble, et al. · Demography (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS