The dynamics of market boundaries and the role of systemic market power

Abstract Identifying the boundaries of a market is a critical component of most antitrust and competition policy areas. While there are established practices for market definition and delineation, dynamic processes of competition and the novel phenomenon of (digital) ecosystems provide new challenges: market boundaries become (i) inherently dynamic and subject to evolutionary change and (ii) subject to the deliberate design of powerful companies. Consequently, the prediction of post-event effects—for example, competitive effects resulting from a merger or an instance of abuse of market power—may fail if it relies on a static or stationary market definition. If market boundaries change inherently through dynamic market competition, identifying these boundaries and their evolution becomes an integral part of a dynamic approach to competition policy rather than mere preparatory work. Furthermore, if companies wield systemic market power within ecosystems (eg cross-market power) and thus have the power to shape market boundaries and deliberately alter (previous) market delineations, the identification of market boundaries cannot be regarded independently of the exploitation of market power. Both dynamics of market boundaries necessitate a different approach to market definition than the one outlined in the Commission’s 2024 Market Definition Notice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnaf008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dynamics of market boundaries and the role of systemic market power

Oliver Budzinski, Annika Stöhr
1 citations
Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
3.09
article

The dynamics of market boundaries and the role of systemic market power

Oliver Budzinski, Annika Stöhr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Identifying the boundaries of a market is a critical component of most antitrust and competition policy areas. While there are established practices for market definition and delineation, dynamic processes of competition and the novel phenomenon of (digital) ecosystems provide new challenges: market boundaries become (i) inherently dynamic and subject to evolutionary change and (ii) subject to the deliberate design of powerful companies. Consequently, the prediction of post-event effects—for example, competitive effects resulting from a merger or an instance of abuse of market power—may fail if it relies on a static or stationary market definition. If market boundaries change inherently through dynamic market competition, identifying these boundaries and their evolution becomes an integral part of a dynamic approach to competition policy rather than mere preparatory work. Furthermore, if companies wield systemic market power within ecosystems (eg cross-market power) and thus have the power to shape market boundaries and deliberately alter (previous) market delineations, the identification of market boundaries cannot be regarded independently of the exploitation of market power. Both dynamics of market boundaries necessitate a different approach to market definition than the one outlined in the Commission’s 2024 Market Definition Notice.

Journal of Antitrust EnforcementVol. 14(1)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.