On the Limits of Chronological Age

Analysis of population aging is typically framed in terms of chronological age. However, chronological age itself is not necessarily deeply informative about the aging process. This article reviews literature and conducts empirical analyses aimed at investigating whether chronological age is a reliable proxy for physiological functioning when used in models of economic behavior and outcomes. We show that chronological age is an unreliable proxy for physiological functioning due to appreciable differences in how aging unfolds across people, health domains, and over time. We further demonstrate that chronological age either fails to predict economic variables when used in lieu of physiological functioning or predicts additional effects on economic behavior and outcomes that are largely unrelated to physiological aging. Continued reliance on chronological age as a proxy for physiological functioning might impede the ability of societies to fully harness the benefits of increasing longevity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080824-112429
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Historical and Archaeological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
304.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Limits of Chronological Age

David E. Bloom, Rainer Kotschy, Andrew Scott
8 citations
Annual Review of Economics
Historical and Archaeological Studies
304.02
article

On the Limits of Chronological Age

David E. Bloom, Rainer Kotschy, Andrew Scott
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Analysis of population aging is typically framed in terms of chronological age. However, chronological age itself is not necessarily deeply informative about the aging process. This article reviews literature and conducts empirical analyses aimed at investigating whether chronological age is a reliable proxy for physiological functioning when used in models of economic behavior and outcomes. We show that chronological age is an unreliable proxy for physiological functioning due to appreciable differences in how aging unfolds across people, health domains, and over time. We further demonstrate that chronological age either fails to predict economic variables when used in lieu of physiological functioning or predicts additional effects on economic behavior and outcomes that are largely unrelated to physiological aging. Continued reliance on chronological age as a proxy for physiological functioning might impede the ability of societies to fully harness the benefits of increasing longevity.

Annual Review of EconomicsVol. 17(1)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), Harvard University (US), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), London Business School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Historical and Archaeological Studies
304.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Limits of Chronological Age — David E. Bloom, Rainer Kotschy, et al. · Annual Review of Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS