Efficacy of Intragastric Balloon Treatment: Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction 6 Months After Removal

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This study aimed to investigate the weight loss, changes in eating habits, and satisfaction with the intragastric balloon (IGB) procedure in patients undergoing treatment for obesity, with follow-up until 6 months after IGB removal. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included patients who underwent the IGB procedure between January 2020 and September 2024 at our clinic and were followed-up for 6 months after IGB removal. Patient records were retrieved from the endoscopy database. Parameters before IGB and during IGB removal were obtained from these records. Upon obtaining verbal consent from patients contacted via their registered phone numbers, their self-reported weights 6 months after IGB removal were recorded, and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. During the same interview, patients were asked about their eating habits before IGB and 6 months after IGB removal, as well as their satisfaction with the procedure, based on questionnaires used in previous studies. The data collected included patients' age, sex, weight, BMI, percentages of weight and BMI loss at IGB removal and 6 months after IGB removal, duration of IGB placement, maximum weight lost during IGB placement, time to achieve maximum weight lost, changes in eating habits, and satisfaction levels. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of the 62 patients who were included in this study was 33.24 ± 8.71 years, with 37 (59.67%) women and 25 (40.32%) men. The mean weight of the patients before IGB was 91.58 ± 7.04 kg, and the mean BMI was 32.00 ± 4.25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean duration of IGB placement was 5.83 ± 0.41 months, with a mean maximum weight loss of 14.22 ± 4.70 kg and a mean time to achieve weight loss of 3.91 ± 0.91 months. There was a statistically significant difference between the weight before the IGB and the weight at IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was also noted in the weight before the IGB and 6 months after IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The comparison of satisfaction levels showed no statistically significant difference in eating habits before the IGB (<i>p</i> = 0.384), whereas a significant difference was found in eating habits 6 months after IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The weight loss differences between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients were significant at IGB removal and 6 months after, although no statistical difference was found in the pre-IGB weights between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Patients undergoing the IGB procedure for obesity should correct their poor eating habits to maintain successful mid-term weight loss results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040616
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Intragastric Balloon Treatment: Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction 6 Months After Removal

Vedat Kaplan, Hasan Elkan, Mehmet Sait Berhuni, Baran Yüksekyayla
1 citations
Medicina
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
article

Efficacy of Intragastric Balloon Treatment: Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction 6 Months After Removal

Vedat Kaplan, Hasan Elkan, Mehmet Sait Berhuni, Baran Yüksekyayla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This study aimed to investigate the weight loss, changes in eating habits, and satisfaction with the intragastric balloon (IGB) procedure in patients undergoing treatment for obesity, with follow-up until 6 months after IGB removal. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This study included patients who underwent the IGB procedure between January 2020 and September 2024 at our clinic and were followed-up for 6 months after IGB removal. Patient records were retrieved from the endoscopy database. Parameters before IGB and during IGB removal were obtained from these records. Upon obtaining verbal consent from patients contacted via their registered phone numbers, their self-reported weights 6 months after IGB removal were recorded, and their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. During the same interview, patients were asked about their eating habits before IGB and 6 months after IGB removal, as well as their satisfaction with the procedure, based on questionnaires used in previous studies. The data collected included patients' age, sex, weight, BMI, percentages of weight and BMI loss at IGB removal and 6 months after IGB removal, duration of IGB placement, maximum weight lost during IGB placement, time to achieve maximum weight lost, changes in eating habits, and satisfaction levels. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of the 62 patients who were included in this study was 33.24 ± 8.71 years, with 37 (59.67%) women and 25 (40.32%) men. The mean weight of the patients before IGB was 91.58 ± 7.04 kg, and the mean BMI was 32.00 ± 4.25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean duration of IGB placement was 5.83 ± 0.41 months, with a mean maximum weight loss of 14.22 ± 4.70 kg and a mean time to achieve weight loss of 3.91 ± 0.91 months. There was a statistically significant difference between the weight before the IGB and the weight at IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was also noted in the weight before the IGB and 6 months after IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The comparison of satisfaction levels showed no statistically significant difference in eating habits before the IGB (<i>p</i> = 0.384), whereas a significant difference was found in eating habits 6 months after IGB removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The weight loss differences between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients were significant at IGB removal and 6 months after, although no statistical difference was found in the pre-IGB weights between the satisfied and dissatisfied patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Patients undergoing the IGB procedure for obesity should correct their poor eating habits to maintain successful mid-term weight loss results.

MedicinaVol. 61(4)
Harran University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.