Early and Long-Term Performance of Stent Grafts Released in Dacron vs. Native Ascending Aorta During Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a prosthetic and native aorta proximal landing zone (PLZ) for hybrid thoracic aorta repair with a stent graft deployed in the Zone 0 ascending aorta. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 100 patients who underwent Zone 0 hybrid thoracic aorta repair between 2005 and 2022, at a single institution. Fifty-eight (58%) had a Dacron PLZ (ascending aorta replacement with debranching), and forty-two (42%) had a native ascending aorta PLZ (off-pump aortic arch debranching). All the surviving patients had at least one radiological follow-up. Results: Patients with a native aorta PLZ were older (p = 0.01) and had higher rates of pulmonary disease (p = 0.01) and chronic kidney disease (p = 0.01) and a higher Logistic EUROscore (p = 0.02). In-hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (2.3% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.68). Retrograde aortic dissection was observed in four (9.2%) of the native PLZ group. The mean follow-up was 37 ± 22 months in the Dacron PLZ group and 42 ± 20 months in the native PLZ group (p = 0.05). At 1,3, and 5 years, freedom from Type Ia endoleak was significantly higher in patients with a Dacron PLZ: 100% vs. 96 ± 0.3%, 100% vs. 85 ± 1%, and 100% vs. 66 ± 1.3% (p = 0.03). Despite this, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was similar between groups: 100% vs. 96 ± 0.4%, 90 ± 1% vs. 89 ± 0.6%, and 66 ± 1% vs. 64 ± 2%. (p = 0.96). Conclusions: Endograft deployment in a prosthetic ascending aorta is a safe and durable option for aortic repair. A Dacron PLZ is associated with a lower rate of Type Ia endoleak and can prevent retrograde aortic dissection when compared with native aorta.