Engels, the Dialectics of Nature, and the Birth of “Marxism”

Sven-Eric Liedman’s The Game of Contradictions (2022) sets out to be both the most comprehensive study of Engels’s work on the social implications of 19th-century developments in the natural sciences and the most detailed analysis of this aspect of the Marx–Engels relationship. While noting the richness and depth of Liedman’s research, this essay argues that his critique of Engels as a system builder is one-sided. Liedman’s focus on the negative aspects of system building obscures the positive implications of Engels’s research. Far from damning 20th-century Marxism, Engels’s historical naturalism confirms that his ideas are more relevant than ever. The contemporary environmental crisis is simultaneously a natural and a capitalist crisis, and any adequate attempt to conceptualize it would be well advised to begin from insights both of his and Marx’s works. Unfortunately, despite highlighting overlaps between Marx’s and Engels’s approaches to the relation between social and natural sciences, Liedman’s dismissive approach to Engels’s Dialectics of Nature blinds him to the continuing relevance of this fundamental resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237241312552
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engels, the Dialectics of Nature, and the Birth of “Marxism”

Paul Blackledge
Science & Society
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Engels, the Dialectics of Nature, and the Birth of “Marxism”

Paul Blackledge
article en

Abstract

Sven-Eric Liedman’s The Game of Contradictions (2022) sets out to be both the most comprehensive study of Engels’s work on the social implications of 19th-century developments in the natural sciences and the most detailed analysis of this aspect of the Marx–Engels relationship. While noting the richness and depth of Liedman’s research, this essay argues that his critique of Engels as a system builder is one-sided. Liedman’s focus on the negative aspects of system building obscures the positive implications of Engels’s research. Far from damning 20th-century Marxism, Engels’s historical naturalism confirms that his ideas are more relevant than ever. The contemporary environmental crisis is simultaneously a natural and a capitalist crisis, and any adequate attempt to conceptualize it would be well advised to begin from insights both of his and Marx’s works. Unfortunately, despite highlighting overlaps between Marx’s and Engels’s approaches to the relation between social and natural sciences, Liedman’s dismissive approach to Engels’s Dialectics of Nature blinds him to the continuing relevance of this fundamental resource.

Science & SocietyVol. 89(1)
Shanxi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.