Comparison of AI Platforms in Answering Patient Questions About Fibroids

INTRODUCTION: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms has become increasingly popular and widespread. Its utility in basic sciences, medical education, research, and clinical practice are currently being explored. These public platforms are also available to patients, who may resort to AI chatbots to learn more about their health. This study aims to investigate the accuracy and reliability of various AI platforms in answering frequently asked patient questions about fibroids. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy and reliability of various AI platforms in answering frequently asked patient questions about uterine fibroids METHODS: Frequently asked questions about uterine fibroids were searched on artificial intelligence platforms, and a compilation of answers was assessed by three expert gynecologists. Answers to these questions from reliable, non-AI sources compiled from academic medical centers, D and E, were also assessed. Gynecologists were blinded to the source of the answers. The accuracy of the answers was assessed on a scale of 1 (least accurate) to 5 (most accurate). The answers were also assessed for their language, word count, and understandability. RESULTS: The median scores for ChatGPT, DoximityGPT, and Gemini were 5.00, 5.00, and 5.00, respectively. In contrast, the reliable, non-AI sources D and E were less accurate, with median scores of 3.00 and 4.00, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in median scores when comparing all three chatbot answers to source D. There was also a statistically significant difference for the question, “Do fibroids need treatment,” when comparing all three chatbot answers to source D. CONCLUSIONS: AI-generated answers were overall accurate and reliable in answering patient questions about uterine fibroids. Reviewers found the AI-generated answers to be easy to read and understand. In contrast, reliable sources from academic medical centers were less accurate with more differences in reviewer ratings in the accuracy of their answers. Chatbot-generated answers can provide patients with general information, but further evaluation by an expert gynecologist is needed to provide comprehensive, individualized patient care (Table 1).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005851.181
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of AI Platforms in Answering Patient Questions About Fibroids

Mireille Truong, Obiora Ezike, Chuanhong Liao, Kathryn A. Hamilton et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Comparison of AI Platforms in Answering Patient Questions About Fibroids

Mireille Truong, Obiora Ezike, Chuanhong Liao, Kathryn A. Hamilton, R Schneyer, R.O. Meyer
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms has become increasingly popular and widespread. Its utility in basic sciences, medical education, research, and clinical practice are currently being explored. These public platforms are also available to patients, who may resort to AI chatbots to learn more about their health. This study aims to investigate the accuracy and reliability of various AI platforms in answering frequently asked patient questions about fibroids. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy and reliability of various AI platforms in answering frequently asked patient questions about uterine fibroids METHODS: Frequently asked questions about uterine fibroids were searched on artificial intelligence platforms, and a compilation of answers was assessed by three expert gynecologists. Answers to these questions from reliable, non-AI sources compiled from academic medical centers, D and E, were also assessed. Gynecologists were blinded to the source of the answers. The accuracy of the answers was assessed on a scale of 1 (least accurate) to 5 (most accurate). The answers were also assessed for their language, word count, and understandability. RESULTS: The median scores for ChatGPT, DoximityGPT, and Gemini were 5.00, 5.00, and 5.00, respectively. In contrast, the reliable, non-AI sources D and E were less accurate, with median scores of 3.00 and 4.00, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in median scores when comparing all three chatbot answers to source D. There was also a statistically significant difference for the question, “Do fibroids need treatment,” when comparing all three chatbot answers to source D. CONCLUSIONS: AI-generated answers were overall accurate and reliable in answering patient questions about uterine fibroids. Reviewers found the AI-generated answers to be easy to read and understand. In contrast, reliable sources from academic medical centers were less accurate with more differences in reviewer ratings in the accuracy of their answers. Chatbot-generated answers can provide patients with general information, but further evaluation by an expert gynecologist is needed to provide comprehensive, individualized patient care (Table 1).

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 145(5S)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Georgetown University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), Jefferson Hospital (US), MedStar Health (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.