U-Shaped Horizontal Swimming Technique for Preparing High-Quality Sperm with Low DNA Fragmentation Index

Human semen is a complex mixture comprising progressively motile spermatozoa, non-progressively motile spermatozoa, immotile spermatozoa, cell debris, and viscous seminal plasma. High-quality sperm refers to progressively motile spermatozoa with normal morphology, which often exhibit a lower DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and higher fertilization potential. Preparing high-quality sperm is a critical step in human-assisted reproductive technology. The traditional sperm preparation method, discontinuous density gradient centrifugation (DGC), is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Repeated centrifugation can damage sperm DNA, thereby affecting subsequent fertilization and embryo development. This study introduces a U-shaped horizontal swimming (UHS) method for preparing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) sperm, which significantly eliminates the detrimental effects of centrifugation on sperm DNA. The UHS method involves creating a UHS lane using a fertilization medium within an ICSI operating dish. A 10 µL fertilization medium microdroplet is placed at the starting point on the left side of the UHS lane to hold the semen. Two additional 10 µL fertilization medium buffer droplets are positioned at intervals along the left middle section of the lane, with all droplets connected by fertilization medium. The dish is then covered with culture oil and incubated overnight at 37 °C with 6% CO2 to equilibrate. Subsequently, 3 µL of semen is added to the microdroplet at the starting point. High-quality spermatozoa swim to the right side of the UHS lane, facilitating their suction into the ICSI injection needle. Dead sperm, cell debris, and other viscous impurities largely remain at the initial point or in the buffer droplets. We simultaneously processed 21 semen samples using both UHS and DGC techniques and compared their DFI. The results demonstrated that the DFI in the DGC group was 5.5% ± 3.2%, whereas the DFI in the UHS group was 1.7% ± 1.1%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).