Trust in AI-assisted health systems and AI’s trust in humans

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, promising improved diagnostics, personalized treatments, and streamlined operations. Yet a lack of trust remains a persistent barrier to widespread adoption. This Perspective examines the web of trust in AI-assisted healthcare systems, exploring the relationships it shapes, the systemic inequalities it can reinforce, and the technical challenges it poses. We highlight the bidirectional nature of trust, in which both patients and providers must trust AI systems, while these systems rely on the quality of human input to function effectively. Using models of care-seeking behavior, we explore the potential of AI to affect patients’ decisions to seek care, influence trust in healthcare providers and institutions, and affect diverse demographic and clinical settings. We argue that addressing trust-related challenges requires rigorous empirical research, equitable algorithm design, and shared accountability frameworks. Ultimately, AI’s impact hinges not just on technical progress but on sustaining trust, which may erode if biases persist, transparency falters, or incentives misalign.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Health Systems
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-025-00016-5
Citations
33
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in AI-assisted health systems and AI’s trust in humans

Mario Macis, Michael Darden, Tinglong Dai, Madeline Sagona
33 citations
npj Health Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
20.94
article

Trust in AI-assisted health systems and AI’s trust in humans

Mario Macis, Michael Darden, Tinglong Dai, Madeline Sagona
article en
33 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, promising improved diagnostics, personalized treatments, and streamlined operations. Yet a lack of trust remains a persistent barrier to widespread adoption. This Perspective examines the web of trust in AI-assisted healthcare systems, exploring the relationships it shapes, the systemic inequalities it can reinforce, and the technical challenges it poses. We highlight the bidirectional nature of trust, in which both patients and providers must trust AI systems, while these systems rely on the quality of human input to function effectively. Using models of care-seeking behavior, we explore the potential of AI to affect patients’ decisions to seek care, influence trust in healthcare providers and institutions, and affect diverse demographic and clinical settings. We argue that addressing trust-related challenges requires rigorous empirical research, equitable algorithm design, and shared accountability frameworks. Ultimately, AI’s impact hinges not just on technical progress but on sustaining trust, which may erode if biases persist, transparency falters, or incentives misalign.

npj Health SystemsVol. 2(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
20.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.