Prey size mediates interference competition and predation dynamics in a large carnivore community

Direct competition for resources is especially fierce among predators, leading to disproportionately strong effects on fitness and functional roles. These competitive effects are exacerbated in complex predator guilds with dominance hierarchies that have clear winners and losers. The direct costs of losing these competitions are well understood, but the drivers of such interactions, and their indirect effects on prey, are not. We evaluate the drivers of interference competition for cougars, and how such competition affects cougar-prey dynamics, by leveraging 23 years of cougar predation data from Yellowstone National Park, USA. We show that the effect of prey size is context-dependent, negatively affecting how often cougars kill ungulate prey but positively affecting how often wolves/bears find and steal cougar kills. Further, cougars increasingly kill smaller prey as larger, primary prey density decreases. Handling time is shorter for smaller prey, leading to less kleptoparasitism by wolves and bears when primary prey density is lower. Our study counters the theory suggesting that interference competition should increase at kills when prey density declines, interspecific competitor density increases, or kill rates increase. We demonstrate that predator, competitor, and prey traits drive the strength of and even dampen interference competition, possibly increasing coexistence in complex communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07779-5
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prey size mediates interference competition and predation dynamics in a large carnivore community

Colby B. Anton, Jack W. Rabe, Toni K. Ruth, Douglas W. Smith et al.
8 citations
Communications Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
13.73
article

Prey size mediates interference competition and predation dynamics in a large carnivore community

Colby B. Anton, Jack W. Rabe, Toni K. Ruth, Douglas W. Smith, Daniel R. Stahler, Matthew C. Metz, Joseph K. Bump, Bruce A. Smith, Wesley Binder, Connor J. Meyer, Kerry Murphy
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Direct competition for resources is especially fierce among predators, leading to disproportionately strong effects on fitness and functional roles. These competitive effects are exacerbated in complex predator guilds with dominance hierarchies that have clear winners and losers. The direct costs of losing these competitions are well understood, but the drivers of such interactions, and their indirect effects on prey, are not. We evaluate the drivers of interference competition for cougars, and how such competition affects cougar-prey dynamics, by leveraging 23 years of cougar predation data from Yellowstone National Park, USA. We show that the effect of prey size is context-dependent, negatively affecting how often cougars kill ungulate prey but positively affecting how often wolves/bears find and steal cougar kills. Further, cougars increasingly kill smaller prey as larger, primary prey density decreases. Handling time is shorter for smaller prey, leading to less kleptoparasitism by wolves and bears when primary prey density is lower. Our study counters the theory suggesting that interference competition should increase at kills when prey density declines, interspecific competitor density increases, or kill rates increase. We demonstrate that predator, competitor, and prey traits drive the strength of and even dampen interference competition, possibly increasing coexistence in complex communities.

Communications BiologyVol. 8(1)
Utah State University (US), The Nature Conservancy (US), University of Minnesota (US), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US), US Forest Service (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US), Yellowstone Ecological Research Center (US), Yellowstone National Park, University of Montana (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, National Park Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
13.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.