Friends as neighbors? Geographic closeness improves support to other governments

This paper delves into the dynamic relationship between where the conflict takes place and public support for military intervention in the context of friendly countries facing aggression. Focusing on the recent surge of Western assistance to Ukraine and the growing concerns about China–Taiwan tensions, our experimental study, conducted in Japan and Czechia, investigates whether regional proximity influences individuals’ willingness to endorse the use of force. Findings reveal significant variations in support based on the distance from the conflict zone, with Czech respondents less inclined to support intervention in Taiwan, contrasting with Japanese respondents. These insights pose critical considerations for the future of the liberal international order and military planning, underscoring the challenges in garnering widespread public backing for interventions in geographically distant scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251325159
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Friends as neighbors? Geographic closeness improves support to other governments

Atsushi Tago, Michal Onderčo
3 citations
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
article

Friends as neighbors? Geographic closeness improves support to other governments

Atsushi Tago, Michal Onderčo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper delves into the dynamic relationship between where the conflict takes place and public support for military intervention in the context of friendly countries facing aggression. Focusing on the recent surge of Western assistance to Ukraine and the growing concerns about China–Taiwan tensions, our experimental study, conducted in Japan and Czechia, investigates whether regional proximity influences individuals’ willingness to endorse the use of force. Findings reveal significant variations in support based on the distance from the conflict zone, with Czech respondents less inclined to support intervention in Taiwan, contrasting with Japanese respondents. These insights pose critical considerations for the future of the liberal international order and military planning, underscoring the challenges in garnering widespread public backing for interventions in geographically distant scenarios.

Conflict Management and Peace ScienceVol. 43(1)
Waseda University (JP), Charles University (CZ), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
American Political Science Association, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Academia Sinica, Norges Forskningsråd, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.