Geopolitical risk and energy markets in China

We examine the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) on China's energy markets, focusing on carbon emission allowance prices, the clean energy stock index, the environmental–social–governance (ESG) 100 stock index, and the gas and oil stock index. Using a quantile-on-quantile regression with kernel regularized least squares methodology, we analyze weekly data from China from March 2, 2015, to December 26, 2022. Findings reveal that GPR negatively affects carbon market prices and ESG stocks, particularly when these markets are in weaker states. Conversely, clean energy stocks benefit from geopolitical uncertainties under favorable market conditions, while traditional energy stocks exhibit resilience and even strengthen due to their strategic importance during periods of heightened GPR. Moreover, GPR significantly drives energy market volatility, with amplified effects in high-volatility market conditions. This quantile-specific approach provides a nuanced understanding of how GPR influences energy assets, emphasizing the importance of tailored risk management strategies. Our findings highlight the necessity of integrating GPR assessments into investment decisions and policy frameworks to reduce the uncertainty affecting China's energy markets. • Examine the nonlinear and asymmetric impact of geopolitical risk on energy markets. • Use the quantile-on-quantile regression with kernel regularized least squares method. • We provide guidance on better managing risks in energy markets in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104187
Citations
34
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical risk and energy markets in China

Shangmei Zhao, Wei Li, Ummara Razi, Xiao Gu et al.
34 citations
International Review of Financial Analysis
Global Energy Security and Policy
60.93
article

Geopolitical risk and energy markets in China

Shangmei Zhao, Wei Li, Ummara Razi, Xiao Gu, Xiaomei Su, Jiale Yan
article en
34 citations

Abstract

We examine the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) on China's energy markets, focusing on carbon emission allowance prices, the clean energy stock index, the environmental–social–governance (ESG) 100 stock index, and the gas and oil stock index. Using a quantile-on-quantile regression with kernel regularized least squares methodology, we analyze weekly data from China from March 2, 2015, to December 26, 2022. Findings reveal that GPR negatively affects carbon market prices and ESG stocks, particularly when these markets are in weaker states. Conversely, clean energy stocks benefit from geopolitical uncertainties under favorable market conditions, while traditional energy stocks exhibit resilience and even strengthen due to their strategic importance during periods of heightened GPR. Moreover, GPR significantly drives energy market volatility, with amplified effects in high-volatility market conditions. This quantile-specific approach provides a nuanced understanding of how GPR influences energy assets, emphasizing the importance of tailored risk management strategies. Our findings highlight the necessity of integrating GPR assessments into investment decisions and policy frameworks to reduce the uncertainty affecting China's energy markets. • Examine the nonlinear and asymmetric impact of geopolitical risk on energy markets. • Use the quantile-on-quantile regression with kernel regularized least squares method. • We provide guidance on better managing risks in energy markets in China.

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 103
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Institute on Governance (CA), Berkeley College (US), Beihang University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Global Energy Security and Policy
60.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.