Modeling and Simulation of Syngas Potential From Supercritical Water Gasification of Combustible Municipal Solid Waste Materials

Municipal solid waste (MSW) generation has threatened human health and the environment while being a renewable energy source for green energy transition. Traditional waste‐to‐energy technologies have shown their limits in terms of energy efficiency and pollution, whereas numerous studies were conducted on “supercritical water gasification (SCWG) technology to achieve a neutral carbon footprint. However, there is limited research and a lack of knowledge on SCWG of different combustible municipal solid waste (CMSW) materials. Hence, this study aimed to assess the gasification efficiencies and syngas potential from SCWG of different CMSW materials, composed of putrescible, miscellaneous combustible (MC), plastic, textile, and paper&cardboard, through modeling and simulation in Aspen Plus. The energy content and greenhouse gas (GHG) potential of predicted syngas composed of H 2 , CH 4 , CO, and CO 2 were assessed under optimal operating conditions obtained through sensitivity analysis. As a result, the temperature of 650°C, pressure of 22 MPa, and waste‐to‐water ratio of 1:5 were optimal conditions with temperature being the most influencing parameter on the gasification. Moreover, putrescible achieved the lowest gasification efficiency (GE), carbon gasification efficiency (CE), hydrogen gasification efficiency (HE), and energy recovery (ER) of 83.379%, 99.981%, 25.629%, and 8.657%, respectively, with the lowest high heating value (HHV) of 0.94 MJ/kg, low heating value (LHV) of 0.80 MJ/kg, and GHG potential of 0.002 kg CO 2 eq. The highest CE (100.013%) and ER (243.067%) were obtained from textile and paper&cardboard, respectively, while the highest GE (155.165%) and HE (140.213%) were obtained from plastic. Plastic showed the highest energy content, with an HHV of 42.98 MJ/kg and LHV of 38.30 MJ/kg, along with the highest GHG potential (15.788 kg CO 2 eq), attributed to its inherent high yields of H 2 and CH 4 . Therefore, decision‐makers could consider syngas recovery from SCWG of CMSW to mitigate environmental pollution and offset fossil fuel dependency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/er/6039763
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and Simulation of Syngas Potential From Supercritical Water Gasification of Combustible Municipal Solid Waste Materials

Kanlanféi Sambiani, Yendoubé Lare, Zanguina Adamou, Satyanarayana Narra et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Energy Research
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
article

Modeling and Simulation of Syngas Potential From Supercritical Water Gasification of Combustible Municipal Solid Waste Materials

Kanlanféi Sambiani, Yendoubé Lare, Zanguina Adamou, Satyanarayana Narra, Rakshak Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) generation has threatened human health and the environment while being a renewable energy source for green energy transition. Traditional waste‐to‐energy technologies have shown their limits in terms of energy efficiency and pollution, whereas numerous studies were conducted on “supercritical water gasification (SCWG) technology to achieve a neutral carbon footprint. However, there is limited research and a lack of knowledge on SCWG of different combustible municipal solid waste (CMSW) materials. Hence, this study aimed to assess the gasification efficiencies and syngas potential from SCWG of different CMSW materials, composed of putrescible, miscellaneous combustible (MC), plastic, textile, and paper&cardboard, through modeling and simulation in Aspen Plus. The energy content and greenhouse gas (GHG) potential of predicted syngas composed of H 2 , CH 4 , CO, and CO 2 were assessed under optimal operating conditions obtained through sensitivity analysis. As a result, the temperature of 650°C, pressure of 22 MPa, and waste‐to‐water ratio of 1:5 were optimal conditions with temperature being the most influencing parameter on the gasification. Moreover, putrescible achieved the lowest gasification efficiency (GE), carbon gasification efficiency (CE), hydrogen gasification efficiency (HE), and energy recovery (ER) of 83.379%, 99.981%, 25.629%, and 8.657%, respectively, with the lowest high heating value (HHV) of 0.94 MJ/kg, low heating value (LHV) of 0.80 MJ/kg, and GHG potential of 0.002 kg CO 2 eq. The highest CE (100.013%) and ER (243.067%) were obtained from textile and paper&cardboard, respectively, while the highest GE (155.165%) and HE (140.213%) were obtained from plastic. Plastic showed the highest energy content, with an HHV of 42.98 MJ/kg and LHV of 38.30 MJ/kg, along with the highest GHG potential (15.788 kg CO 2 eq), attributed to its inherent high yields of H 2 and CH 4 . Therefore, decision‐makers could consider syngas recovery from SCWG of CMSW to mitigate environmental pollution and offset fossil fuel dependency.

International Journal of Energy ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Université Abdou Moumouni (NE), West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (GH), University of Lomé (TG), University of Rostock (DE), Tripura University (IN)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, Universität Rostock
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.